2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne laser scanning: Exploratory data analysis indicates potential variables for classification of individual trees or forest stands according to species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
77
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there have been a few attempts to use LiDAR intensities in glacier monitoring, land cover classification, and forest type identification [9], [13], [36], [40], [47]. However, it should be noted that the backscattered LiDAR intensity values are a function of many other variables in additional to the material characteristics of the targets hit by the laser beam.…”
Section: Lidar Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been a few attempts to use LiDAR intensities in glacier monitoring, land cover classification, and forest type identification [9], [13], [36], [40], [47]. However, it should be noted that the backscattered LiDAR intensity values are a function of many other variables in additional to the material characteristics of the targets hit by the laser beam.…”
Section: Lidar Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D attributes of discrete-return single frequency Li-DAR have been used to classify open water and wetland surfaces (Hogg and Todd 2007;Goodale et al 2007;Crasto et al 2015); forested land cover types and species (Moffiet et al 2005;Antonarakis et al 2008;Vaukonen et al 2010;Korpela et al 2010). LiDAR 3D derivatives have also been combined with passive multispectral data in forest environment classifications (Koukoulas and Blackburn 2005;Holmgren et al 2008;Ke et al 2010;Millard and Richardson 2013;Yang et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR 3D derivatives have also been combined with passive multispectral data in forest environment classifications (Koukoulas and Blackburn 2005;Holmgren et al 2008;Ke et al 2010;Millard and Richardson 2013;Yang et al 2014). Traditionally, however, single-frequency LiDAR signal intensity alone (i.e., through intensity thresholding) has not been considered of high value for species classification due to the many controls, in addition to surface reflectance, that influence intensity values (Moffiet et al 2005;Hopkinson 2007). When 3D and intensity responses are considered together, forest species classification improves .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vrhove posameznih dreves v gozdnem sestoju lahko ločimo med seboj z različnimi algoritmi, ki iščejo lokalne maksimume v surovih podatkih ali na digitalnih modelih krošenj (Reitberger et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2009;Li et al, 2012;Mongus in Žalik, 2015). Če k preučevanju geometrijskih odvisnosti med točkami dodamo še preučevanje intenzitete odbitih laserskih točk, lahko raziskave razširimo na preučevanje zmožnosti določitve posameznih drevesih vrst v laserskih podatkih (Holmgren in Persson, 2004;Moffiet et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2009;Ørka et al, 2009;Korpela et al, 2010). Ker je intenziteta laserskih točk odvisna od različnih parametrov, ta naloga še zdaleč ni enostavna in rešena.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified