Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Sensing 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3055601.3055604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne Disease Propagation on Large Scale Social Contact Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We vary the value of P from 0 to 1 with the step 0.1. The seed nodes start infecting at T = 0 and continue infecting for the period of days picked up randomly from the range (1,5). With this set of seed nodes, we run simulations on the both SPST and SPDT networks and repeat 200 times for each value of P. We set the mean value of b to 0.01min −1 and the median of g to 1h −1 .…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We vary the value of P from 0 to 1 with the step 0.1. The seed nodes start infecting at T = 0 and continue infecting for the period of days picked up randomly from the range (1,5). With this set of seed nodes, we run simulations on the both SPST and SPDT networks and repeat 200 times for each value of P. We set the mean value of b to 0.01min −1 and the median of g to 1h −1 .…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can be explained with an example of airborne disease spreading where an infected individual deposits infectious particles at the locations where they visit. These particles can transmit to susceptible individuals who visit the locations even after the infected individual leaves as the airborne infectious particles suspend in the air for a long time [3,5]. Therefore, susceptible individuals do not need to be in the same place at the same time with the infected individual to contract disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assumed that the coexistence should last longer than 20 s. In case shorter encounters should be monitored as well, we will have to evaluate the impact of the window size over which the correlation is computed. Finally, the `same-place-different-time (SPDT)’ disease transmissions [ 31 ] (or `co-location’ [ 30 ]) will be an interesting extension of the current work. We believe such contact types will be detected by coping with time gaps and distortions stemming from moving speed differences and detours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the type of contact we aim to detect in this paper is coexistence, or `trajectory bundle’ [ 30 ]. It is because this `same-place-same-time’ (SPST) contact type is more common in infectious disease transmissions than the `same-place-different-time’ (SPDT) type [ 31 ] (not to mention social contacts). Since the smartphone users are assumed to stay/move together in this type of contact, we do not need to align the traces for the time gap and the moving speed differences by using such schemes as Dynamic Time Window (DTW).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of current contact-based vaccination strategies is that they only focus on direct contacts between individuals. Our recent work [17][18][19][20] introduced the concept of indirect transmission, where disease can transmit through indirect interaction (in addition to direct interactions), which is representative of many infectious diseases. For example, a acknowledge the Distributed Sensing System Group, Data61, CSIRO for providing research facilities for this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%