2023
DOI: 10.1177/01655515231151406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AIRank: An algorithm on evaluating the academic influence of papers based on heterogeneous academic network

Abstract: Evaluation of papers’ academic influence is a hot issue in the field of scientific research management. Academic big data provides a data treasure with the coexistence of different types of academic entities, which can be used to evaluate academic influence from a more macro and comprehensive perspective. Based on academic big data, a heterogeneous academic network composed of links within and between three types of academic entities (authors, papers and venues) is constructed. In addition, a new academic infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of the scholarly node influence of the collaboration subnetwork between scholars is formulated as shown in Eq. ( 19) and (20).…”
Section: B Novelty Indicator Calculation Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation of the scholarly node influence of the collaboration subnetwork between scholars is formulated as shown in Eq. ( 19) and (20).…”
Section: B Novelty Indicator Calculation Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Influence score: In our previous research [20], an algorithm for evaluating the academic influence of papers based on heterogeneous academic networks, AIRank, was proposed. By distinguishing the differences in the propagation strength of influence among node pairs and comprehensively examining the enhancement effect brought by the influence of heterogeneous neighbors, an effective evaluation of the academic influence of papers is achieved based on heterogeneous academic networks.…”
Section: B Novelty Indicator Calculation Modulementioning
confidence: 99%