2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2017.8247986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air traffic simulation with 4D multi-criteria optimized trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with typical input variables for trajectory optimization, such as city pair, aircraft type, engine type, payload, optimization function (i.e., minimum fuel burn, minimum time of flight, minimum contrail impact, or multi-criteria optimization), a trajectory optimization model with implemented key performance assessment can be used for the calculation of the optimum vertical and lateral path. Here, we use the validated simulation environment TOMATO [28][29][30] which includes the aircraft performance model COALA [31,32] for vertical optimization and for the quantification of the emissions. In TOMATO, the trajectory is optimized iteratively by assessing each interim solution regarding several key performance indicators (KPI) including contrails [33].…”
Section: Flight Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with typical input variables for trajectory optimization, such as city pair, aircraft type, engine type, payload, optimization function (i.e., minimum fuel burn, minimum time of flight, minimum contrail impact, or multi-criteria optimization), a trajectory optimization model with implemented key performance assessment can be used for the calculation of the optimum vertical and lateral path. Here, we use the validated simulation environment TOMATO [28][29][30] which includes the aircraft performance model COALA [31,32] for vertical optimization and for the quantification of the emissions. In TOMATO, the trajectory is optimized iteratively by assessing each interim solution regarding several key performance indicators (KPI) including contrails [33].…”
Section: Flight Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the implementation of the 4D trajectory management, aircraft will not be constrained by waypoints and flight levels any more. Hence, air traffic will be more homogeneously distributed in the upper air space [20][21][22] . Therewith, the available capacity (i.e.…”
Section: Air Traffic Flow Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, non-constant air speeds and cruising altitudes spread the aircraft more widely within the airspace and therewith increase the possible airspace capacity (i.e. maximum number of aircraft, integrated over the whole European airspace) 21,22 although wind speed and wind direction are considered in the optimisation function, amongst others. In the scenario of optimised trajectories, 1,637 artificial airspaces out of 2,739 (61°l ongitude times 39°latitude) artificial airspaces are used by aircraft during this hour, whereas in the reference scenario, only 1,554 artificial airspaces out of 2,739 artificial airspaces are used (compare Fig.…”
Section: Impact Of Optimised Trajectories On the Atfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research in the field of air traffic management primarily addresses the economic and ecological impact of flight trajectories (cf. [10][11][12][13]) but has to include efficient aircraft ground operations as well in order to ensure an efficient aircraft trajectory over the day of operations [14]. In this context, research was conducted with regards to the turnaround performance implementing collaborative management [15] or addressing the future airport performance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%