Air to Air Energy Recovery from HVAC Systems under Different Membrane Materials

Al-Waked, Rafat F.; Nasif, Mohammad Shakir

doi:10.13189/ujme.2019.070202

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was found that the heat exchanger with the modified cellulose acetate membrane had the highest energy recovery. The main influencing factor on the performance was the variation of ambient relative humidity [ 21 ]. In addition to integral asymmetric membranes with a dense skin layer, thin-film composite membranes are highly-specific membranes that have been proposed for water treatment, pervaporation, and gas/vapor separation [ 22 , 23 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Air-to-Air Heat and Moisture Recovery in a Plate-Frame Exchanger Using Composite and Asymmetric Membranes

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present work studied an air-to-air exchanger comprising a flat plate module with a diagonal channel and a counterflow configuration for the air streams. The objective of this study was to remove moisture and sensible heat from an exhaust air stream by indirect contact with another air stream. The temperature and flow rate of the exhaust air was in the range of 40–80 °C and 1–5 L·min−1, respectively, and the fresh ambient air to exhaust air flow ratio was 1–5. An asymmetric porous membrane (P-MEM), a thin film composite membrane (C-MEM), and a kraft paper were used as the core for the heat exchange module. The most influential parameter was the humid air temperature, with a direct positive effect (50–60%) due to the increase in the kinetic energy of the water molecules. The other effective parameter was the flow rate of the humid gas with a reverse effect on the enthalpy exchanger performance (25–37%). The ratio of “fresh” air to “exhaust” air had the lowest positive effect (8–10%) on the total effectiveness. The sensible effectiveness of different membranes under the studied conditions was relatively the same, showing their similar heat conductivity. However, the kraft paper showed the best performance compared to the synthetic membranes due to having a porous/hydrophile texture. P-MEM with an asymmetric porous texture showed the closest performance to kraft paper. Furthermore, it was found that under limited conditions, such as higher temperatures (70 and 80 °C) and flow rates (5 L·min−1) for the humid air, the performance of P-MEM was a little better than the kraft paper. However, C-MEM with the lowest total effectiveness and overall heat transfer coefficient (150–210 W·m−2·K−1) showed that the hydrophile PEBAX layer could not contribute to moisture recovery due to its high thickness.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%