Air Suctioning During Colon Biopsy Acquisition Reduces Bacterial Contamination

Abstract

Background and Aim: Contamination of endoscopy suites with bacteria during procedures is of concern particularly through droplets during handling of biopsy specimens. It has been advocated that suctioning while removing the biopsy forceps could help to reduce potentially hazardous bioaerosols. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of air suctioning during removal of the biopsy forceps. Materials and Methods: Airborne bacteria were collected by an impactor air-sampler (MAS-100). Fifty liters of air were collected continuously for 30 seconds at a 30 cm distance from the colonoscope suction channel. Room air samples were taken in the endoscopy suite in the morning prior to the beginning of the endoscopy program, during colonoscopy with a sham biopsy in the descending colon with and without suctioning and at the end of the procedure day. Standard 90 mm Petri dishes containing a selective medium for gram-positive cocci (CNA blood agar) were used with the impaction sampler and colony forming units/m3 (cfu) were determined. Results: Measurements were performed at fifty consecutive colonoscopies. Prior to the beginning of the endoscopy program, the bioaerosol burden in the colonoscopy suite reached a mean of 4.2 cfu/m3. During colonoscopies performed without suctioning at biopsy the bioaerosol burden increased to 29.4 cfu/m3 whereas this burden increased only to 15.1 cfu/m3 when the suctioning was applied during removal of the biopsy forceps. The difference in bioaerosol burden between suctioning and no suctioning was highly significant (p < 0.0005). At the end of the procedure day the airborne bacteria count dropped to 15.6 cfu/m3. The analysis of the colonies on the CNA blood agar identified predominantly enterococci. Staphylococci spp. and other gram-positive bacteria were rarely isolated. Conclusion: The present study indicates that the bioaerosol burden during handling of biopsy specimens is not neglectable but can be reduced by the simple habit of applying suctioning during acquisition of biopsies. This practice might be an important infection-control measure during gastrointestinal endoscopies. Air Suctioning During Colon Abstract (Word count 245)Background and Aim: Contamination of endoscopy suites with bacteria during procedures is of concern. It has been advocated that suctioning while removing biopsy forceps could help to reduce hazardous bioaerosols. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of air suctioning during removal of biopsy forceps. Materials and Methods:During colonoscopy endoscopists were asked to remove the biopsy forceps with and without suction after having touched the sigmoid mucosa.Fifty litres of air were collected continuously for 30 seconds at 30 cm distance from the colonoscope suction channel. Airborne bacteria were collected by an impactor air-sampler (MAS-100). Standard 90 mm Petri dishes with CNA blood agar were used to culture gram positive cocci. Room measurements prior to the first endoscopy and after the last endoscopy of the day were ...

Assessing the efficacy of photocatalytic oxidation on bacterial contamination in a clinical setting – a randomised controlled trial

“…The unit has dimensions of 165 x 165 x 175 mm and was programmed to be on the maximum setting. The MAS-100 was used to sample air contamination (Gangeux et al, 2006;Vavricka et al, 2006). It was placed at a height of 1 m above ground level in a horizontal position.…”

Update des Addendums zu den S3-Leitlinien Morbus Crohn und Colitis ulcerosa: Betreuung von Patienten mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen in Bezug auf COVID-19 (Version 2.0)

“…Die Erhebung einer Serologie oder Durchführung einer Antigen-Testung vor einer Endoskopie erscheint aufgrund der fehlenden Bedeutung der Serologie bei asymptomatischen Patienten und der geringeren Testsensitivität der Antigentests nicht sinnvoll 74 und wird auch in den aktuellen ESGE-ESGENA Leitlinien nicht mehr empfohlen 75 .…”

“…Eine Verminderung der Aerosolbildung sollte angestrebt werden. Dies kann durch vorsichtiges Entfernen von Materialien aus dem Arbeitskanal und insbesondere eine kontinuierliche Absaugung während der Extraktion erreicht werden 75 .…”

Infection Control During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

“…However, if a culture returned with a low number of coliform bacteria, does this mean there is a reprocessing failure? Two interesting abstracts (13,14) from Digestive Disease Week in May 2006 presented data that air contamination of endoscopic procedure rooms with enteric bacteria is common (suggesting that these culture results could also represent environmental contamination rather than reprocessing failure). Because the utility of routine environmental surveillance cultures has not been established, it is not yet recommended in the United States multisociety guideline (1).…”