2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air side contamination in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell stack testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the present experiences, also kinetic information regarding individual sulphur oxidation steps can be accessed, because the time for reaching stable fluorescence signal after changing the SOFC temperature took longer than the shortest data accumulation period practised here (w30 min). Developed an operando SOFC-XAS cell is versatile as it also allows studying contamination effects at the air-fed cathode side, including Cr [56] poisoning and alkaline elements if appropriate X-ray windows for higher oxygen partial pressures are applied. The presented cell allows also to obtain the metal (in the present case Ni and Ce) absorption edges, which may facilitate the identification of Ni-and CeO 2 -related reaction products with sulphur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the present experiences, also kinetic information regarding individual sulphur oxidation steps can be accessed, because the time for reaching stable fluorescence signal after changing the SOFC temperature took longer than the shortest data accumulation period practised here (w30 min). Developed an operando SOFC-XAS cell is versatile as it also allows studying contamination effects at the air-fed cathode side, including Cr [56] poisoning and alkaline elements if appropriate X-ray windows for higher oxygen partial pressures are applied. The presented cell allows also to obtain the metal (in the present case Ni and Ce) absorption edges, which may facilitate the identification of Ni-and CeO 2 -related reaction products with sulphur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of interconnects protective layers -either applied as a thin coating or developed in-situ through high-temperature scale formation -are used as a countermeasure but cannot completely suppress the emission of Cr-species into the gas phase [3,4]. Similar degradation issues may be caused by poisoning of the cathode with silicon species released into the gas stream from silicate-based glass sealing materials or heat-resistant alloys used in BOP-components [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]) have considered the severity of chromium poisoning of (La,Sr)MnO 3 -based cathodes depending on whether the SOFC is operated under load or is held at open-circuit, whether the air supplied to the cathode is dry or humidified, and depending on the interconnect metallic alloy used (Inconel 600, Cr5Fe1Y 2 O 3 , Crofer22APU, RA446, 17-4 stainless steel, AISI 441, SUS430, ITM or ZMG232).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming slow kinetics, the non-observation of chromium-substituted (La,Sr)MnO 3 is not surprising considering that exposure times in all but one (Menzler et al [13], 8,000 h exposure time) of the above-cited chromium poisoning studies were ≤ 3,000 h and therefore short compared to SOFC system lifetime requirements, which exceed 40,000 h [20,22]. Moreover, it would be nearly impossible to distinguish any chromium-substituted (La,Sr)MnO 3 formed from (La,Sr)MnO 3 using the common technique of X-ray diffractometry (XRD), since these materials are isostructural on account of the fact that the ionic radii [23] of VI-coordinate (high spin) Mn 3+ (0.645 Å) and Cr 3+ (0.615 Å) are similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%