2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jc014803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air‐Sea Turbulent Fluxes From a Wave‐Following Platform During Six Experiments at Sea

Abstract: Turbulent fluxes at the air‐sea interface are estimated with data collected in 2011 to 2017 with a low‐profile platform during six experiments in four regions. The observations were carried out with moderate winds (2–10 m/s) and averaged wave heights of 1.5 m. Most of the time, there was a swell, with an averaged wave age (the ratio between wave phase speed and wind speed) being equal to 2.8 ± 1.6. Three flux calculation methods are used, namely, the eddy covariance (EC), the inertial dissipation (ID), and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between the two crossings of the plume, the two vessels surveyed a salinity-stratified area on the shelf. During this survey, the free-drifting platform Ocarina (Bourras et al, 2019) was deployed for a little more than 12 h. This platform was equipped with a 1,200 kHz ADCP to measure current profiles at 0.5 m resolution between 0.29 and 17.29 m from the sea surface. These data are combined with temperature and salinity profiles collected from the RV Atalante MVP to estimate the gradient Richardson number (R i ) in this stratified near-surface layer at different times of the day.…”
Section: In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the two crossings of the plume, the two vessels surveyed a salinity-stratified area on the shelf. During this survey, the free-drifting platform Ocarina (Bourras et al, 2019) was deployed for a little more than 12 h. This platform was equipped with a 1,200 kHz ADCP to measure current profiles at 0.5 m resolution between 0.29 and 17.29 m from the sea surface. These data are combined with temperature and salinity profiles collected from the RV Atalante MVP to estimate the gradient Richardson number (R i ) in this stratified near-surface layer at different times of the day.…”
Section: In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We feel that this condition is overly strict, especially in tropical regions where swell-dominated light-wind conditions commonly occur, causing wave-coherent wind fluctuations (Prytherch et al 2015;Sullivan and McWilliams 2010). In summary, the motion correction seems to be sufficient to correct the wind spectra in the inertial subrange, but has a relatively light touch, compared to approaches that remove all wave-coherent wind oscillations (e.g., Bourras et al 2019) for lower-frequency oscillations. We suggest this is appropriate for swell conditions.…”
Section: A Flow Distortion and Platform Motionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the wind can include genuine wave-coherent perturbations (Högström et al 2015). This means that the criterion used by Bourras et al (2019) to compare motion correction methods}that they should remove all wave-coherent motions from the wind spectrum}is not suitable in our case. Despite the absence of a clear indicator of accuracy for motion correction, investigations of the Saildrone motion correction are presented below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%