1996
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(96)84207-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air quality assessment of the environment over a cement industrial complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ambient air concentrations at the point of stack deposition did not exceed the USEPA (2011), WHO (1998), PAK EPA (2012), and WB (2012) ambient air quality standards. (Goyal et al, 1996). The sampling point in nearby field was the same at 100% coal use and at the maximum level of substitution i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambient air concentrations at the point of stack deposition did not exceed the USEPA (2011), WHO (1998), PAK EPA (2012), and WB (2012) ambient air quality standards. (Goyal et al, 1996). The sampling point in nearby field was the same at 100% coal use and at the maximum level of substitution i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral part of the automatic station is our own computer code based on the well-known equation of Gaussian straight line plume model [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]: The integral part of the automatic station is our own computer code based on the well-known equation of Gaussian straight line plume model [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]:…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller particles less than 2.5 microns in diameter generally come from combustion of fossil fuels. The emissions from lime kilns consisted of gaseous and particulate matter as a result of combustion of coal and limestone (Goyal et al, 1996). SO 2 is emitted largely from burning coal, high-sulphur oil, and diesel fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%