2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpemd.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air quality assessment during dental practice: Aerosols bacterial counts in an universitary clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-recognized that minor oral surgical, restorative, periodontal, as well as endodontic procedures produce aerosol and splatter contamination that exceeds permissible limits 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Moreover, Index of Microbial Contamination reveals that endodontic procedures generate significantly greater aerosol-produced colony-forming units compared with restorative procedures 10 . In addition, endodontic procedures disperse aerosols as far as 2 m or 6 feet from the patient's head 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-recognized that minor oral surgical, restorative, periodontal, as well as endodontic procedures produce aerosol and splatter contamination that exceeds permissible limits 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 . Moreover, Index of Microbial Contamination reveals that endodontic procedures generate significantly greater aerosol-produced colony-forming units compared with restorative procedures 10 . In addition, endodontic procedures disperse aerosols as far as 2 m or 6 feet from the patient's head 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microorganism which was isolated from the oral abscess developed in these patients was the same strain isolated from the DUWL [34]. Other respiratory infections reported were mild flu and pneumonia, which was caused by Legionella Pneumophilia, non Pneumophilla spp and Mycobacterium spp including Mycobacterium Avium, Staphylococcal and Streptococcal infection [35][36][37]. Pankhurst and associates reported that the presence of Legionella antibodies in dental personnel is higher in comparison to the general population [35].…”
Section: Dental Aerosol and Splattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Index of Air Microbial contamination (IMA) is been proved to be a reliable and useful tool for monitoring the microbial surface contamination settling from the air in any environment. However, its use is not consensual for critical environments such as operating theatres [46]. Pasquarella and associates described the Index of Air Microbial contamination (IMA) based on the count of the microbes on to Petri dishes left open to the air in a dental set up, according to the 1/1/1 scheme (for 1 h, 1 m from the floor, at least 1 m away from walls or any obstacle).…”
Section: Dental Aerosol and Splattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plates have been put in the impactor and grows as a colony, it is then counted as a colony-forming unit, or CFU [12]. This method is easy to implement and low cost thus reproducing the most common culturable conditions regarding total airborne microbial from a particular procedure [13]. According to study by Pasquarella et al [14], bacterial levels less than 39 CFU/dm 2 /h with passive sampling were considered as acceptable values for the air microbial contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%