2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000jb900181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production

Abstract: Abstract. The cosmic ray flux increases at higher altitude as air pressure and the shielding effect of the atmosphere decrease. Altitude-dependent scaling factors are required to compensate for this effect in calculating cosmic ray exposure ages. Scaling factors in current use assume a uniform relationship between altitude and atmospheric pressure over the Earth's surface. This masks regional differences in mean annual pressure and spatial variation in cosmogenic isotope production rates. Outside Antarctica, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
2,061
3
22

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,029 publications
(2,114 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
28
2,061
3
22
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of calibration studies have established the spallogenic and muongenic 36 Cl production system in carbonate rocks [15][16][17][18]. Accordingly the 36 Cl production rates in this study were calculated based on the chemical compositions of the carbonate rock (Tables 2 and 3), and scaled by using geographic information (latitudes and altitudes) of individual locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of calibration studies have established the spallogenic and muongenic 36 Cl production system in carbonate rocks [15][16][17][18]. Accordingly the 36 Cl production rates in this study were calculated based on the chemical compositions of the carbonate rock (Tables 2 and 3), and scaled by using geographic information (latitudes and altitudes) of individual locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bromley et al [37] defined a lower moraine group (~5000-4900 m), extending to the lower area of the glacial valleys, as CI and a higher moraine group (~5500 m), deposited in the middle part of the Santiago valley, as CII. For each group of moraines they found two age ranges, depending on the scaling model used: Lm [70] or Li [71][72][73]: -CI moraines:~25-15 ka (Lm) and~21-12 ka (Li), with outlier ages~47 and~31 ka (Li) and~61 and~37 ka (Lm). -CII moraines:~11-12 ka (Lm) and~11-8 ka (Li).…”
Section: Snowlines Elas and Glacial Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Illimani (Smith et al, 2011), ages were not available in the Shakun et al (2015a) composite, and we recalculated with the Quelccaya 10 Be production rate calibration (Kelly et al, 2015), and the CRONUS-Earth calculator version 2.3 with the time-invariant 'St' scaling method of Stone (2000) following Lal (1991). Newly published data from the Cordillera Carabaya (Bromley et al, 2016) and Nevado Huaguruncho (Stansell et al, 2015) were calculated by the authors using the Quelccaya production rates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%