2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air pollution: A systematic review of its psychological, economic, and social effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
96
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
96
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data span the period from January 1, 2010 to December 9, 2012, with different coverage periods for the two offices. 8 An additional feature of our data is that, during part of our study period, Ctrip performed a controlled experiment to analyze whether working from home affected 6 Nantong is approximately 100 kilometers north of Shanghai. 7 Call quality was assessed based on a 1 percent sample of recorded call transcripts that were audited and scored by an external review team.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data span the period from January 1, 2010 to December 9, 2012, with different coverage periods for the two offices. 8 An additional feature of our data is that, during part of our study period, Ctrip performed a controlled experiment to analyze whether working from home affected 6 Nantong is approximately 100 kilometers north of Shanghai. 7 Call quality was assessed based on a 1 percent sample of recorded call transcripts that were audited and scored by an external review team.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we do not have access to this data. 8 The difference in data coverage periods is due to a combination of pollution data availability and the time coverage of the productivity data provided by the firm. The Shanghai data sample runs from January 1, 2010 to August 14, 2011.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air pollution, primarily by fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 , and the heavy metals therein), has been a years-long fundamental worldwide health, social, and economic issue [1,2,3]. In 2015, exposure to PM 2.5 was already the fifth-leading mortality risk factor and contributed to 7.6% of deaths worldwide [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traders on Wall Street have lower returns on days with higher level of PM (Heyes et al, 2016), while baseball referees underperform given higher levels of PM (Archsmith et al, 2018). 3 A number of recent studies show individuals' decision-making effects of PM that point at the possibility that PM reduces risk-taking (Lu, 2019). For example, Heyes et al (2016) argue that one possible interpretation of their findings for lower returns for Wall Street traders is that PM induces these traders to take less risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%