Air Force Human Systems Integration (HSI) in Test and Evaluation (T&E)

Abstract

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. REPORT DATE Executive SummaryThe study and findings described in this report are part of a larger effort that is focused on Human Systems Integration (HSI) in acquisition and was conceived and sponsored by the Air Force's 711 th Human Performance Wing's Human Performance Optimization Division (711 HPW/HPO). Other projects in this effort include HSI in the Systems Engineering Plan, in the Life Cycle Management Plan, and in the Systems Requirements Document.This study on HSI in Test and Evaluation (T&E) examined T&E processes, planning teams, guiding documentation, and roles to uncover opportunities for improving the visibility and treatment of HSI in T&E. The study team engaged Subject Matter Experts (SME) from the T&E and HSI communities in a one day workshop to identify focus areas for the project. The participants identified the following five areas as needing attention: 1) testable requirements; 2) guidance documents; 3) linkages with existing tests; 4) improved measurement methods; and 5) usability shortfalls.The study team conducted focused interviews and performed document reviews to shape investigations for each of the five areas. The investigations generated recommendations for modifications to Air Force policy, instructions, and guidance for T&E. These are included as appendices to this report.A key feature of the study was the development of 26 HSI-related sample entries for the T&E Top-Level Evaluation Framework Matrix (the "Framework"). The Framework is a required section of Test and Evaluation Strategy and Test and Evaluation Master Plan documents. The Framework displays the program's developmental and operational test process at a glance by tying together high-level user requirements (including Key Performance Parameters), key test measures, critical test parameters, and test methodologies. The Framework had been identified by workshop participants as a primary opportunity for including HSI in T&E processes, and thus will become a key enabler for better integration of HSI and T&E.The HSI-related Framework examples developed during this task link HSI to existing tests and program decisions, describe...

Mercury Contamination of Skin-whitening Creams in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

“…31 The European Union (EU) also allows titanium dioxide at 250,000 μg/g, but currently does not allow zinc oxide. 32 At times both zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are also added without dispersants so that a whitening effect is achieved (white coloring, not suppression of melanin production). Titanium dioxide has been shown to induce production of ROS.…”

Snail mucus as an innovative ingredient used in the cosmetology and medical industry

“…The nomenclature given in the Cosmetic Ingredient Database (CosIng) indicates that the following cosmetic raw materials from snail mucus are used in cosmetics in the European Union: Snail secretion filtrate (INCI: Snail Secretion Filtrate) and fermented snail secretion/slime filtrate (INCI: Saccharomyces / SnailSecretion Filtrate Ferment Filtrate). The most common raw material in cosmetics is Snail Secretion Filtrate [19].…”

Marine Ingredients for Sensitive Skin: Market Overview

“…Microalgae are also well-represented, with 13% of the studied formulations containing these marine ingredients (Figure 1). For several years, the use of the designation "algae extract" as a marine ingredient present in several cosmetic formulations with no specification of the species was permitted and included in the European Commission database for information on cosmetic ingredients contained in cosmetics (CosIng) [41]. Nowadays, the Commission requires that the new name assignment should be based on the current genus and species name of the specific alga.…”