1986
DOI: 10.1002/dc.2840020213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air drying as a preparatory factor in cytology: Investigation of its influence on dye uptake and dye binding

Abstract: The effect of air-drying on cytological material is investigated in this article. Smears of rat liver were fixed completely wet and, after air drying, postfixed in ethanol, methanol/formaldehyde/acetic acid (MFA), and formaldehyde. Staining was performed with the thionin-Feulgen procedure, a standard Romanowsky-Giemsa stain with azure B-eosin Y and a Papanicolaou staining variant. The image analysis system IBAS 2000 was applied to evaluate objective criteria of the changes caused by air drying the chromatin te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IOD of nuclei fixed in alcohol fixatives is higher than IOD of air-dried nuclei in all tissue types, which is in agreement with previous reports [19,20,24]. The possible explanation for higher values of alcohol fixed nuclei was offered in previous reports, which stated that alcohol precipitates the nuclear proteins and more binding sites are recovered on the DNA for the stain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The IOD of nuclei fixed in alcohol fixatives is higher than IOD of air-dried nuclei in all tissue types, which is in agreement with previous reports [19,20,24]. The possible explanation for higher values of alcohol fixed nuclei was offered in previous reports, which stated that alcohol precipitates the nuclear proteins and more binding sites are recovered on the DNA for the stain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Differences in the segmentation procedure between programs and glare (having a larger effect on smaller dense particles) may explain the generally higher IOD values in lymphocytes than in granulocytes. In general, critical remarks on DNA image cytometry should address not only instrumentation but also sampling (10) and specimen preparation (2,3,6,9,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because different objectives are used, the distribution error varies (13). In general, critical remarks on DNA image cytometry should address not only instrumentation but also sampling (10) and specimen preparation (2,3,6,9,15). Differences in the segmentation procedure between programs and glare (having a larger effect on smaller dense particles) may explain the generally higher IOD values in lymphocytes than in granulocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%