2009
DOI: 10.1080/03639040802680255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air-dictated bottom spray process: impact of fluid dynamics on granule growth and morphology

Abstract: Unlike conventional fluidized bed granulation, ease of modulation of fluid dynamics and insensitivity of the bottom spray process to wetting allow flexible control of granule size, shape, and flow. Its good drying ability also indicated potential use in granulating moisture-sensitive materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chlorpheniramine maleate (BP grade, China) was used as a model drug. (18) Granules are irregular in shape (18) "One-pot" system for contained production (19) More spray drying of binder solution Bottom spray Smaller granules (20) Denser granules (20,21) Spherical granules with better flow (21) Slower granule growth (20) Smoother surface granules (22) Higher risk of overwetting Less spray drying of binder solution (23) Need reasonably well flowing feed powders Robust process at low spray rate (21). Tangential spray Supports higher spray rate (24,25) Denser granules (25,26) Less dependent on flow properties of powder feed (26) Material loss due to adhesion to friction plate (26) Powder elutriation only at higher airflow (24) Scale-up designs are expensive and impractical Granule growth is relatively uniform (25) Risk of bed overwetting is high Granules have good flow properties (25,26) Granules have low friability (25) Homogeneous drug distribution (26) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorpheniramine maleate (BP grade, China) was used as a model drug. (18) Granules are irregular in shape (18) "One-pot" system for contained production (19) More spray drying of binder solution Bottom spray Smaller granules (20) Denser granules (20,21) Spherical granules with better flow (21) Slower granule growth (20) Smoother surface granules (22) Higher risk of overwetting Less spray drying of binder solution (23) Need reasonably well flowing feed powders Robust process at low spray rate (21). Tangential spray Supports higher spray rate (24,25) Denser granules (25,26) Less dependent on flow properties of powder feed (26) Material loss due to adhesion to friction plate (26) Powder elutriation only at higher airflow (24) Scale-up designs are expensive and impractical Granule growth is relatively uniform (25) Risk of bed overwetting is high Granules have good flow properties (25,26) Granules have low friability (25) Homogeneous drug distribution (26) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%