2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air defense missile-target allocation models for a naval task group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, it is assumed that m j = 1 for ∀j ∈ {1, 2,...,T}. This is a rational setting for missile-based defense systems and the "SLS" engagement policy [19]. For artillery-based defense systems, the value of m j (j = 1, 2,...,T) may be substantially increased under the same demand in defensive strength.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, it is assumed that m j = 1 for ∀j ∈ {1, 2,...,T}. This is a rational setting for missile-based defense systems and the "SLS" engagement policy [19]. For artillery-based defense systems, the value of m j (j = 1, 2,...,T) may be substantially increased under the same demand in defensive strength.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second related study is weapon target assignment (WTA) [7][8][9][10] (also known as target allocation and target problem). The WTA problem seeks to find the optimal allocation of friendly weapons to targets for minimising the expected survival value or maximising the expected damage of targets 10 .…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-jamming danger value is computed using (2) where V n is the post-jamming danger value, F n is the jamming factor, and E n,final is the final jamming effect. The jamming factor is a multiplicative factor used to account for the effect of jamming on the danger value posed by a threat.…”
Section: Jamming Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1], [2]). These systems represent a similar problem to that of TEJA in terms of threat evaluation and allocation of resources, but do not take into account the specific characteristics associated with actions in the EMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%