Air Defense: A Computer Game for Research in Human Performance

Kelly, Richard T.; Greitzer, Frank L.; Hershman, Ramon L.

doi:10.1037/e549542013-001

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Resource Allocation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1984

1987

Publication Types

Select...

Other1

Article1

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trejo states that most decision makers are risk-aversive, which obviously influences the strategy in reaching a decision. Trejo, Lewis, and Blankenship (1987a) reported on irrelevant probe EP data acquired during the performance of the Air Defense Radar Simulation Task (AIRDEF); (Kelly, Greitzer, & Hershman, 1981;Trejo, 1986). The subject views two concentric circles on a graphics monitor.…”

Section: Resource Allocationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evoked Brain Activity and Personnel Performance

Lewis¹,

Sorenson²

1987

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resource Allocationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evoked Brain Activity and Personnel Performance

Lewis¹,

Sorenson²

1987

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information Theoretic Models of Memory in Human Decisionmaking Models

Hall

Levis

1984

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Models of memory and information storage useful in the modeling and analysis of decisionmaking with bounded rationality are discussed. An information theoretic model of permanent memory is presented for describing the accessing of stored information by the algorithms within the human decisionmaker model. It is then applied to the study of the performance -workload characteristic of a decisionmaker performing a dual task.

show abstract

The Gamification of Employee Selection Tools

Hawkes

Cek

Handler³

Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The major hypotheses of this experiment were that students who play a computer game in teams of two or three will perform at least as well as those who play the game individually. and that teams of two or three students will be at least as successful in the game as individual students. Sixth graders of high academic ability were divided into four groups. Three of the groups played a computer game: one group played alone. one played in pairs. and one in threes. The fourth group did not play the game. All the svbiects then took a test designed to measur e learning from the game. No significant differences in learning were observed. but there was a statistically significant tendency for boys to play the game faster than girls. A difference in the machines used to play the game produces no consistent or significant effects. Appendices give some statements from the game and the test questions. (Author/JY)

show abstract

Air Defense: A Computer Game for Research in Human Performance

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Evoked Brain Activity and Personnel Performance

Evoked Brain Activity and Personnel Performance

Information Theoretic Models of Memory in Human Decisionmaking Models

The Gamification of Employee Selection Tools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About