2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air-conditioned university laboratories: Comparing CO 2 measurement for centralized and split-unit systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the data logger is ±0.3°C for the temperature range from 0°C to +50°C, <2.5% RH for the range from 10 to 90% and ±30 ppm ±5% of the measured carbon dioxide value. The measuring and recording device was placed, following [17,18] at 1.2 m above the floor level, in the middle of the auditorium. Thus the data was collected from the central location of the room, with a special attention of being away from direct influence of room occupants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the data logger is ±0.3°C for the temperature range from 0°C to +50°C, <2.5% RH for the range from 10 to 90% and ±30 ppm ±5% of the measured carbon dioxide value. The measuring and recording device was placed, following [17,18] at 1.2 m above the floor level, in the middle of the auditorium. Thus the data was collected from the central location of the room, with a special attention of being away from direct influence of room occupants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high CO 2 concentrations recorded in the office space show that the office space was inadequately ventilated in the restricted air circulation of the ACSU office building as the air movements recorded was low and could perhapse provide the conditions for bacterial growth. The CO 2 concentration in indoor air indicates ventilation rate, comfort status, indoor air quality, high occupancy rate and pollution levels (Godwin & Batterman, 2007;Mahayuddin & Awbi, 2012;Batog & Badura, 2013;McGill et al, 2015;Fan et al, 2017;Hussin, 2017;Al-Awadi, 2018). Thus, the high CO 2 concentrations level in the office space reflected the lack of ventilation, poor air quality, and the indoor air is not refreshed enough within the office building.…”
Section: Indoor Air Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing scientific evidence during the last few decades has indicated that the concentrations of certain pollutants in indoor air maybe 2 to5 times, and occasionally more than 100 times higher, than those in outdoor air (USEPA, 2017;Zock et al, 2002). Therefore, the indoor air quality in the office building needs to be monitored as it is an essential factor in maintaining employee productivity and health (Kubba, 2009;Hussin 2017). Vasile et al (2016) suggested increasing the airtightness of the building envelope by analysing and making use of the natural ventilation system.…”
Section: Indoor Air Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air quality is associated with physical, chemical and biological characteristics of indoor air, including the concentration of pollutants like carbon dioxide (CO2). It is known that high CO2 concentration in indoor environments is an outcome of human metabolism and lack of indoor air exchange -mainly due to the air recirculation by air-conditioners [7,9]. One of the main strategies that contribute to the reduction of pollutants concentration and improvement of air quality is suitable air circulation in order to allow air exchange between indoor and outdoor environments [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%