2019
DOI: 10.1017/epi.2019.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aiming at Aptness

Abstract: This paper discusses Ernest Sosa's account of knowledge and epistemic normativity. The paper has two main parts. The first part identifies places where Sosa's account requires supplementation if it is going to capture important epistemic phenomena. In particular, additional theoretical resources are needed to explain (i) the way in which epistemic aims are genuinely good aims, and (ii) the way in which some forms of reasoning can be epistemically better than others even when they are equally conducive to attai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60 For a recent defense of the idea that inquiry is knowledge-aimed, within a wider knowledge-first virtue epistemology, see Kelp (2021). 61 Cf., Schechter (2019) for criticism. 62 Unless, of course, time is expiring.…”
Section: E N D N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 For a recent defense of the idea that inquiry is knowledge-aimed, within a wider knowledge-first virtue epistemology, see Kelp (2021). 61 Cf., Schechter (2019) for criticism. 62 Unless, of course, time is expiring.…”
Section: E N D N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) for a helpful development of this idea. For criticism seeSchechter (2019).27 For a discussion on this point, seeSosa (2020, 29) and also(2015,.28(Sosa 2015, 166).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%