2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00328.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AIDS pathogenesis: a tale of two monkeys

Abstract: Despite many years of intense scientific effort, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the immunodeficiency that follows human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are still poorly understood. This lack of understanding is likely the main reason why at present there is neither a cure nor a vaccine for AIDS. Important clues on the immunopathogenesis of primate lentiviral infections have been provided by comparative studies of two simian models of SIV infection: the non-pathogenic SIV infection of sooty mangabe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22]35 The robust genetic, 36,37 phenotypic, and functional similarities 25,38 between the macaque and human immune systems have made it a preferred model for the study of both transplant immunology [20][21][22]38,39 and of protective immunity and infectious disease. 40,41 Our results with this model document rapid, significant lymphocyte mobilization with AMD3100, which included mobilization of multiple subpopulations, including B cells, NK cells, both CD4 and CD8 T cells, and their Tn, Tcm, and Tem subpopulations. In contrast, G-CSF treatment alone led to no B-, T-, or NK-cell mobilization, despite Figure 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[18][19][20][21][22]35 The robust genetic, 36,37 phenotypic, and functional similarities 25,38 between the macaque and human immune systems have made it a preferred model for the study of both transplant immunology [20][21][22]38,39 and of protective immunity and infectious disease. 40,41 Our results with this model document rapid, significant lymphocyte mobilization with AMD3100, which included mobilization of multiple subpopulations, including B cells, NK cells, both CD4 and CD8 T cells, and their Tn, Tcm, and Tem subpopulations. In contrast, G-CSF treatment alone led to no B-, T-, or NK-cell mobilization, despite Figure 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We first show that naive CD4 T cells are indeed the principal source of lymphotoxin-␤ for maintenance of the FRC network because antibody-mediated depletion of CD4 T cells, but not CD8 T cells, in rhesus macaques reproduced the depletion of the FRC network in SIV-infected rhesus macaques and HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, we found that, in the nonpathogenic model of SIV infection of sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys), 53,54 the maintenance of CD4 T cells in sooty mangabeys correlated with maintenance of the FRC network and that CD4 T-cell depletion by antibody in uninfected sooty mangabeys, also significantly depleted the FRC and follicular dendritic cell networks, reproducing the pathogenic effect in SIV-infected rhesus macaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, the dynamics of SIV infection in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta; RM) have been comprehensively studied and described (10,26,27,35,56). Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that the course of SIV infection in PTM more closely resembles HIV infection in humans than does SIV infection in RM (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%