1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02404181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aids for editing Walden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting early suggestion of a dynamic system was provided by Todd Bender in 1976 and was echoed by Donald Ross Jr. in 1981. Both scholars conceived of formal textual editing as a computer project that 'should be set up and preserved in such a way that future scholars can return to it and use it in its electronic form' (Bender 1976b: 194).…”
Section: Analytical Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting early suggestion of a dynamic system was provided by Todd Bender in 1976 and was echoed by Donald Ross Jr. in 1981. Both scholars conceived of formal textual editing as a computer project that 'should be set up and preserved in such a way that future scholars can return to it and use it in its electronic form' (Bender 1976b: 194).…”
Section: Analytical Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting early suggestion of a dynamic system was provided by Todd Bender in 1976 and was echoed by Donald Ross Jr. in 1981. Both scholars conceived of formal textual editing as a computer project that 'should be set up and preserved in such a way that future scholars can return to it and use it in its electronic form' (Bender 1976b: 194). After analysing the Platonic orientation of modern textual criticism, as advocated at the time by the CEA (College English Association), and the incompatibility of this method in the case of modern literary texts where 'the printed page is inherently incapable of representing the work accurately or fully' (Bender 1976b: 194), Bender introduced computer technology as offering the possibility of retaining 'a version which more closely approximates the essence of a work without disregarding all the mutations which exist in the manuscript and printed representations ' (1976b: 194).…”
Section: Analytical Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%