AID in reprogramming: Quick and efficient

The ability to control the transition from an undifferentiated stem cell to a specific cell fate is one of the key techniques that are required for the application of interventional technologies to regenerative medicine and the treatment of tumors and metastases and of neurodegenerative diseases. Reprogramming technologies, which include somatic cell nuclear transfer, induced pluripotent stem cells, and the direct reprogramming of specific cell lineages, have the potential to alter cell plasticity in translational medicine for cancer treatment. The characterization of cancer stem cells (CSCs), the identification of oncogene and tumor suppressor genes for CSCs, and the epigenetic study of CSCs and their microenvironments are important topics. This review summarizes the application of cell reprogramming technologies to cancer modeling and treatment and discusses possible obstacles, such as genetic and epigenetic alterations in cancer cells, as well as the strategies that can be used to overcome these obstacles to cancer research.

show abstract

The Effects of Nuclear Reprogramming on Mitochondrial DNA Replication

Kelly

Sümer

McKenzie

et al. 2011

Stem Cell Rev and Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) possess low numbers of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which encodes key subunits associated with the generation of ATP through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). As ESCs differentiate, mtDNA copy number is regulated by the nuclear-encoded mtDNA replication factors, which initiate a major replication event on Day 6 of differentiation. Here, we examined mtDNA replication events in somatic cells reprogrammed to pluripotency, namely somatic cell-ES (SC-ES), somatic cell nuclear transfer ES (NT-ES) and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, all at low-passage. MtDNA copy number in undifferentiated iPS cells was similar to ESCs whilst SC-ES and NT-ES cells had significantly increased levels, which correlated positively and negatively with Nanog and Sox2 expression, respectively. During pluripotency and differentiation, the expression of the mtDNA-specific replication factors, PolgA and Peo1, were differentially expressed in iPS and SC-ES cells when compared to ESCs. Throughout differentiation, reprogrammed somatic cells were unable to accumulate mtDNA copy number, characteristic of ESCs, especially on Day 6. In addition, iPS and SC-ES cells were also unable to regulate ATP content in a manner similar to differentiating ESCs prior to Day 14. The treatment of reprogrammed somatic cells with an inhibitor of de novo DNA methylation, 5-Azacytidine, prior to differentiation enabled iPS cells, but not SC-ES and NT-ES cells, to accumulate mtDNA copies per cell in a manner similar to ESCs. These data demonstrate that the reprogramming process disrupts the regulation of mtDNA replication during pluripotency but this can be re-established through the use of epigenetic modifiers.

show abstract

AID in reprogramming: Quick and efficient

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

Understanding Epigenetic Memory is the Key to Successful Reprogramming

Understanding Epigenetic Memory is the Key to Successful Reprogramming

Potential application of cell reprogramming techniques for cancer research

The Effects of Nuclear Reprogramming on Mitochondrial DNA Replication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About