2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aid and Income: Another Time-series Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting estimate of A is used to compute the impulse-response functions. Confidence intervals for the impulse-response functions are computed by bootstrap simulation, see Lof et al (2013) for details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting estimate of A is used to compute the impulse-response functions. Confidence intervals for the impulse-response functions are computed by bootstrap simulation, see Lof et al (2013) for details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shocks are identified recursively. To analyze the dynamic relationship between debt and GDP, we compute impulse-response functions from an estimated Panel VAR (PVAR), in a similar manner as Lof et al (2013) assess the relationship between aid and GDP in developing countries. Using the growth rates (log-differences) of real GDP per capita ( Y) and the growth rate of total gross government debt per capita ( D) as our variables of interest, we estimate the following PVAR:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with much of the literature, our results show no significant positive effect of aid. Lof, Mekasha, and Tarp (2014) (henceforth LMT) criticize one of our approaches in Nowak- Lehman et al 2012) as unsuitable and for omitting a large number of observations from our sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our recent article (Lof, Mekasha, & Tarp, 2014), we replicate the results of Nowak-Lehmann, Dreher, Herzer, Klasen, and Martínez-Zarzoso (2012) and provide two fundamental critical remarks regarding their methodology. First, we revealed that their model is presented in logs, which is not possible as not all variables are strictly positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%