2011
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aid and economic growth: Sensitivity analysis

Abstract: This paper uses panel data from 77 developing countries, two measures of aid, and a dynamic panel data (DPD) estimator to investigate the effects of aid on economic growth. We find that the relationship between income growth and aid is quadratic in nature. We find a negative partial growth effect of aid at low levels of aid but a positive effect when the ratio of aid to gross national income (GNI) reaches a threshold of between 6.6 and 14.4per cent. We find a positive and significant relationship between aid a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, Hansen and Tarp (2001) has shown that marginal returns of aid become negative when these flows exceed 25% of GDP, while Lensink and White (2001) has set this threshold around 40%. As for Gyimah-Brempong et al (2012), they found that aid effect on economic growth in 77 developing countries is positive only if the level of aid was between 6.6 and 14.4% of GDP.…”
Section: Does Aid Effectiveness Depend On the Quality Of Governance Imentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, Hansen and Tarp (2001) has shown that marginal returns of aid become negative when these flows exceed 25% of GDP, while Lensink and White (2001) has set this threshold around 40%. As for Gyimah-Brempong et al (2012), they found that aid effect on economic growth in 77 developing countries is positive only if the level of aid was between 6.6 and 14.4% of GDP.…”
Section: Does Aid Effectiveness Depend On the Quality Of Governance Imentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While some studies concluded that aid does not affect or even negatively affects economic growth (Boone, 1994;Easterly, 2003;Easterly, 2008;Gyimah-Brempong et al, 2012;Moyo, 2008), others showed a positive relationship between aid and growth (Arndt et al, 2015;Clemensn et al, 2004;Galiani et al, 2014;Lof et al, 2015) with a decreasing marginal return of aid (Collier & Dollar, 2001;Dalgaard et al, 2004;Durbarry et al, 1998;Hansen & Tarp, 2001). Others else concluded that aid is only effective at supporting positive economic growth when recipient countries adopt good economic policies (Burnside & Dollar, 2000;Burnside & Dollar, 2004;Chauvet & Guillaumont, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of convergence, taking the country context first, some studies identify minimum thresholds for aid to be effective (Gyimah-Brempong et al, 2012;Kalyvitis et al, 2012;Wagner, 2014). Other studies identify a maximum threshold level for aid to be effective (Alvi et al, 2008;Clemens et al, 2012;Islam, 2005;Wagner, 2014).…”
Section: When Is Aid Most Likely To Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. On this model see later studies and reviews (Islam, 2005;Gyimah-Brempong et al, 2012;Wagner, 2008;Feeny and de Silva, 2012;Feeny and McGillivray, 2011). 9.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of international development cooperation in the fight against poverty has been studied by many authors (McGillivray et al ., ; De Haan, ; Minoiu and Reddy, ; Alvi and Senbeta, ; Gyimah‐Brempong et al ., ) along with government policies implemented by low‐income and middle‐income countries to reduce their poverty gap (Schneider, ; Alonso, ; Owen et al ., ; Orviska et al ., ). Both policies have been and continue to be crucial for effective poverty reduction in these countries.…”
Section: Contextual Framework: Towards a Global System Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%