Aid accessibility: Equity &amp; education in Kenya

Ziff, Alix

doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102772

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jablonski (2014) also shows that sub-national regions in Kenya that are coethnic and co-partisan with the incumbent president were more likely to receive aid, arguing it is used as an electoral incentive for incumbent re-election. More recent evidence suggests that educational aid in Kenya is less likely to be directed towards traditionally politically excluded Somali regions (Ziff, 2023). More broadly, Boone (1996) and Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2012) suggest that political elites tend to benefit most from aid flows.…”

Section: Development Aid and Group-based Exclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does development aid reach politically excluded groups? A Disaggregated Study of the Location of Aid in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Rustad,

Hoelscher,

Kotsadam

et al. 2024

Development Policy Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MotivationDespite an increased focus on inclusive development, we know little about the extent to which development aid reaches politically excluded groups or how this varies across different donors.PurposeAddressing this knowledge gap, we develop and test a framework arguing that (i) areas where politically excluded groups live are less likely to receive development aid, and (ii) there are differences between donor countries and organizations in how they instrumentally address inclusive development.Methods and approachUsing a geographically disaggregated panel dataset of aid projects covering Sub‐Saharan African countries from 1996 to 2013, we combine sub‐national data on the location of aid by donor and type, and data on politically excluded ethnic groups.FindingsFor World Bank aid projects, we do not find evidence that areas with excluded groups are generally prioritized. However, when disaggregating by sector we find that aid projects related to health and water access are significantly more likely to be allocated to areas with excluded groups. Further, we see little indication that Chinese aid is targeted towards areas of political exclusion. Conversely, aid allocations made by donor countries whose development strategies emphasize inclusive and needs‐based approaches are more likely to be established in areas with politically excluded groups.Policy implicationsWe argue that these results indicate diverse underlying political motivations behind the provision of development aid by various donors. These motivations become evident when examining aid allocation by sector and type of donor.

show abstract

Section: Development Aid and Group-based Exclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%