2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9233088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI versus Classic Methods in Modelling Isotopic Separation Processes: Efficiency Comparison

Abstract: In the paper, the comparison between the efficiency of using artificial intelligence methods and the efficiency of using classical methods in modelling the industrial processes is made, considering as a case study the separation process of the 18O isotope. Firstly, the behavior of the considered isotopic separation process is learned using neural networks. The comparison between the efficiency of these methods is highlighted by the simulations of the process model, using the mentioned modelling techniques. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical model that describes the defect propagation can be expressed in the form of a second-order transfer function (representing the simplest form of a higher-order model) [31][32][33][34]. The input signal that produces the variations of the output signal presented in previous figures is considered to be a unitary step (u(t) = 1; U(s) = L{u(t)} = 1/s) having the physical meaning of the event that triggered the fault.…”
Section: Mathematical Models For Experimental Response Determination ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model that describes the defect propagation can be expressed in the form of a second-order transfer function (representing the simplest form of a higher-order model) [31][32][33][34]. The input signal that produces the variations of the output signal presented in previous figures is considered to be a unitary step (u(t) = 1; U(s) = L{u(t)} = 1/s) having the physical meaning of the event that triggered the fault.…”
Section: Mathematical Models For Experimental Response Determination ...mentioning
confidence: 99%