AI: profili etici. Una prospettiva etica sull'Intelligenza Artificiale: princìpi, diritti e raccomandazioni

Quintarelli, Stefano; Corea, Francesco; Fossa, Fabio; Loreggia, Andrea; Sapienza, Salvatore

doi:10.15168/2284-4503-448

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, some experts fear that doctors may become less the deciders, and more the messengers of AI's outputs. 46 AI-doctor communication enables doctors to actively participate in the decisionmaking process 47 because this comprehension makes them more aware of the motives of their (dis)agreement. A doctor's ability to make decisions autonomously is an essential part of the SDM process.…”

Section: Ai-doctor Communication and Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence and the doctor–patient relationship expanding the paradigm of shared decision making

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artificial intelligence (AI) based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are becoming ever more widespread in healthcare and could play an important role in diagnostic and treatment processes. For this reason, AI‐based CDSS has an impact on the doctor–patient relationship, shaping their decisions with its suggestions. We may be on the verge of a paradigm shift, where the doctor–patient relationship is no longer a dual relationship, but a triad. This paper analyses the role of AI‐based CDSS for shared decision‐making to better comprehend its promises and associated ethical issues. Moreover, it investigates how certain AI implementations may instead foster the inappropriate paradigm of paternalism. Understanding how AI relates to doctors and influences doctor–patient communication is essential to promote more ethical medical practice. Both doctors' and patients' autonomy need to be considered in the light of AI.

show abstract

Section: Ai-doctor Communication and Autonomymentioning

confidence: 99%