2023
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2023.3243837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI-Based Resource Allocation in End-to-End Network Slicing Under Demand and CSI Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed framework in [31] aims to maximize the resource allocation efficiency through slices and the user's quality of experience. In [32], an RL-based framework is proposed focusing mainly on eMBB aiming to solve resource allocation problem that are defined with Channel State Information (CSI) uncertainty. The authors model the CSI uncertainty by three methods: worst-case, probabilistic, and hybrid.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed framework in [31] aims to maximize the resource allocation efficiency through slices and the user's quality of experience. In [32], an RL-based framework is proposed focusing mainly on eMBB aiming to solve resource allocation problem that are defined with Channel State Information (CSI) uncertainty. The authors model the CSI uncertainty by three methods: worst-case, probabilistic, and hybrid.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we measured the MARDPG optimality gap using the result of the exhaustive search algorithm as a reference. Finally, in the last scenario, by calculating the fairness score, we can realize how much resources are fairly distributed among the users [73].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on network slicing have investigated the key management functionalities of admission control of slice requests [10,18] and allocation of resources to individual slices [11,35] in isolation. Previous works that jointly addressed the two tasks [4,7,8] have overlook the important trade-offs entailed by: (𝑖) the added revenues of accepting slices that request capacity beyond that available, while not using it all the time; and, (𝑖𝑖) the potential cost of violating SLAs in the moments when the actual demand of all accepted slices exceeds the total capacity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies between (8) and the objective functions of (P1) and (P2) are possible due to slice traffic prediction errors, and are part of the complexity of an overbooking-based NSaaS.…”
Section: Mno Profit From Ac/ra Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%