2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomical, physiological and fruit quality responses of two Italian long-storage tomato landraces under rain-fed and full irrigation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that WS induced a negative effect on leaf biomass and fruit ripening, as confirmed by the reduction of leaf DW and the alteration of fruit-ripening processes. Our results are not consistent with those by other authors [38][39][40] but are in accordance with Khan et al [41]. The differences observed in the WS sensitivity may be due to the severity of drought.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that WS induced a negative effect on leaf biomass and fruit ripening, as confirmed by the reduction of leaf DW and the alteration of fruit-ripening processes. Our results are not consistent with those by other authors [38][39][40] but are in accordance with Khan et al [41]. The differences observed in the WS sensitivity may be due to the severity of drought.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…In WS_P + fruits, a significant increase of total phenols was observed, suggesting that they contribute positively to the antioxidant activity of the tomato water-soluble fraction by reducing the levels of free radicals due to WS (as confirmed by the increase of ORAC and HORAC levels). This response can be considered an adaptive mechanism to water stress that promotes the de novo synthesis of these metabolites [40]. At the end of the experiment, the content of carbohydrates showed a similar trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Nevertheless, the extent of decrease in stomatal conductance depends on the growing period when the water deficiency occurred; at 7 days after anthesis of maize cultivars stomatal conductance decreased by 35% on average but at 21 days after anthesis this decrease was significantly larger (74%) under water deficiency than in well-watered cultivars [100]. In the case of tomatoes grown under non-irrigated conditions, stomatal conductance decreases from 14 to 73% depending on the weather and variety in comparison with the well-watered plants [3,32,87,101] (Table 3). * SPAD = relative chlorophyll content of leaves; NDVI = normalized differential vegetation index.…”
Section: Stomatal Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Guida et al . ) and the primary role played by diffusive conductance in photosynthetic limitations (Galmés et al . , ; Fullana‐Pericàs et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%