2017
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20170038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic performance in radish fertilised with Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. in two growing seasons

Abstract: Desempenho agronômico do rabanete adubado com Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. em duas épocas de cultivo 1 Agronomic performance in radish fertilised with Calotropis procera (Ait.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that both water deficit and excess affected radish quality, which is in accordance with Alves et al (2017) and Noman et al (2018). Silva et al (2017) reported that the presence of cracks is one of the reasons of making a radish noncommercial, but the best way to prevent cracking in roots is to maintain a uniform water supply. Silva et al (2012) tested radish tolerance to soil wetting in Mossoró, RN, and observed its sensitivity to water saturation, especially when stress occurred in the first development stages of the plants, concluding that the radish root system is more sensitive to wetting than the shoot.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that both water deficit and excess affected radish quality, which is in accordance with Alves et al (2017) and Noman et al (2018). Silva et al (2017) reported that the presence of cracks is one of the reasons of making a radish noncommercial, but the best way to prevent cracking in roots is to maintain a uniform water supply. Silva et al (2012) tested radish tolerance to soil wetting in Mossoró, RN, and observed its sensitivity to water saturation, especially when stress occurred in the first development stages of the plants, concluding that the radish root system is more sensitive to wetting than the shoot.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Water deficiency is usually the most limiting factor for obtaining high productivity and good quality products (Carmichael et al, 2012;Abdel, 2015;Cunha et al, 2017), but its excess can also be detrimental. Soil water content during the crop cycle should be maintained constant, avoiding fluctuations to avoid cracks in the roots and decreases in quality (Silva et al, 2012;Alves et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2017;Noman et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This polynomial behaviour, and the optimization of each agronomic characteristic of the beet, can be attributed to the law of the maximum, where the excess of a nutrient in the soil from an increase in its dose can cause toxic effect and/or diminish the effectiveness of others, thus reducing the values of the analyzed variables (Almeida et al, 2015). Another justification that may be related to this behaviour and the optimization is the adequate synchrony between the period of greater nutrient demand by the beetroot and the release of the nutrients by the hairy woodrose (Fontanétti et al, 2006;Silva et al, 2017). Souza et al (2018), in studying the effect of green manure, using different amounts of hairy woodrose in beetroot intercropping with cowpea under the same conditions of semiaridity as this research, observed maximum values of 2.99, 2.98, 2.61, 2.76, 13.97, 12.46 and 1.64 t ha -1 , respectively, for the dry mass of shoots, productivity of roots extra, extra A, extra AA + great, and for total and commercial root productivity when fertilized with the following respective amounts of hairy woodrose: 38.00, 10.00, 55.00, 47.37, 55.00, 55.00 and 10.00 t ha -1 added to the soil.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Agronomic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…] stand out due to their availability, ease of obtaining, high fresh mass production, and high N contents (BATISTA et al, 2016). Some studies have been conducted using these species, which have shown good results as soil fertilizers for leafy and root vegetables and increased commercial yields for single crops (GÓES et al, 2011;SILVA et al, 2011;BEZERRA NETO et al, 2014;OLIVEIRA et al, 2015a;SOUZA et al, 2016;SOUZA et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2017;SOUZA et al, 2019;NUNES et al, 2020) and intercrops (ALMEIDA et al, 2015;OLIVEIRA et al, 2015b;BEZERRA NETO et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%