2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic characteristics of five different urban waste digestates

Abstract: The use of digestate in agriculture is an efficient way to recycle materials and to decrease the use of mineral fertilizers. The agronomic characteristics of the digestates can promote plant growth and soil properties after digestate fertilization but also harmful effects can arise due to digestate quality, e.g. pH, organic matter and heavy metal content. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences and similarities in agronomic characteristics and the value of five urban waste digestates from d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(93 reference statements)
4
61
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH, solids concentrations of the digestate, and feedstock are usually assessed to evaluate the effect of digestate on soil quality and plant growth. The use of alkaline digestate could increase NH 4 -N volatilization from soil during spreading, depending on the temperature [40], and the acidic digestates can decrease soil pH and enhance heavy metal mobilization in soils [41]. Subsequently, the effect of digestate pH on soil is dependent on soil characteristics [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH, solids concentrations of the digestate, and feedstock are usually assessed to evaluate the effect of digestate on soil quality and plant growth. The use of alkaline digestate could increase NH 4 -N volatilization from soil during spreading, depending on the temperature [40], and the acidic digestates can decrease soil pH and enhance heavy metal mobilization in soils [41]. Subsequently, the effect of digestate pH on soil is dependent on soil characteristics [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is possible that application of LFDIG with high mineral N content slightly increase the lettuce FW yield. These results are supported by Tampio et al (), where in a pot experiment 5 different urban digestates produced 5–30% higher ryegrass yields compared to synthetic N fertilizer (NH 4 NO 3 ) with a similar N concentration and equal P and K levels to maintain N as the only responsive nutrient. In order to calculate the ANR and NFRV values, the crop N concentration and yield data were taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NO3 - in lettuce was determined according to Anderson and Case (). Finally, in order to evaluate the fertilizer value of tested products in terms of N, apparent N recovery (ANR; Schröder et al, ; Cavalli et al, ; Tampio et al, ) and N fertilizer replacement value (NFRV; Kai et al, ; Sørensen and Eriksen , ; Schröder et al, ; Cavalli et al, ) were determined as follows: trueANR= false(Nnormal uptake normal TREATMENT -Nnormal uptake normal CONTROL false) totalnormal Nnormal applied normal TREATMENT , trueNFRV(%)= AN Rnormal BIO-BASEDnormal TREATMENT AN Rnormal CANnormal TREATMENT ×100. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enhanced microbial degradation of organic matter and emission of carbon (C), particularly as methane, results in an increase in the proportion of total N that is more readily plant available (i.e., in increase in the ratio of ammonium-N (NH + 4 -N) to total N, typically to >70%), a decrease in the C:N ratio and a lower organic matter and dry matter (DM) content (Webb and Hawkes, 1985;Möller et al, 2008;Tampio et al, 2016). Anaerobic digestion can significantly reduce greenhouse gas and odor emissions (if fugitive emissions are minimized) in comparison with the feedstock (Massé et al, 2011;Battini et al, 2014), and produces a more sanitized product when the feedstock is manure (Orzi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%