2019
DOI: 10.1590/1983-40632019v4954595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrometeorological analysis of the soybean potentiality in an Amazonian environment

Abstract: RESUMO 2018). However, a lack of knowledge regarding the interaction of soybean crops with the Amazonian environment has created inconsistent information about the attainable potential of soybean crops in this region.An approach about the potential yield and yield gaps could help to understand the interactions of the soybean production system with the Amazon agro-ecosystem and, at the same time, develop suitable strategies to improve the yield of a crop (Sentelhas et al. 2015). However, identifying the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean demonstrated good performance for both MG 7.7 and 8.8 in response to plant densities and sowing dates in this short photoperiod low latitude environment. The performance of the model as described by statistical indices are similar to prior studies in Brazil for the north (Lima et al, 2019), midwestern (Teixeira et al, 2019) and southern (Battisti et al, 2017) regions. Furthermore, a characteristic not accounted for by Grimm et al (1993) in the default parameters is the presence of long juvenile phase introduced into soybean germplasm adapted to low latitude (Destro et al, 2001;Carpentieri-Pípolo et al, 2002;Sinclair et al, 2005;Alliprandini et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean demonstrated good performance for both MG 7.7 and 8.8 in response to plant densities and sowing dates in this short photoperiod low latitude environment. The performance of the model as described by statistical indices are similar to prior studies in Brazil for the north (Lima et al, 2019), midwestern (Teixeira et al, 2019) and southern (Battisti et al, 2017) regions. Furthermore, a characteristic not accounted for by Grimm et al (1993) in the default parameters is the presence of long juvenile phase introduced into soybean germplasm adapted to low latitude (Destro et al, 2001;Carpentieri-Pípolo et al, 2002;Sinclair et al, 2005;Alliprandini et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The DSSAT CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean model v 4.7.0 (Hoogenboom et al, 2017) is widely used in Brazil for management evaluation, for example, for tropical conditions (Banterng et al, 2009), climate response (Silva et al, 2017;Battisti and Sentelhas, 2019;Lima et al, 2019) and irrigation (Battisti et al, 2020b). The response to plant density is influenced by the LAI which affects crop evapotranspiration and photosynthesis rates during the life cycle.…”
Section: Description Of Plant Density Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, it is hypothesized that the optimal sowing window (OSW) may change according to the ENSO phase (El Niño, La Niña and neutral). This hypothesis has been previously tested and confirmed through simulations using dynamic crop models that integrate meteorological elements, soil characteristics and crop management (Hallinor et al 2018, Lima et al 2019, Nóia Júnior & Sentelhas 2019, and these studies emphasize the potential of crop models as a tool for climate risk analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The ENSO impacts on the Amazon climate, in terms of ecology and hydrology, are well documented (Shimizu et al 2017, Brum et al 2018. However, studies about the ENSO effects on agricultural yield in the region are scarce, even with agricultural losses often evidenced in El Niño years, such as the reduction in soybean yields in the States of northern Brazil in 2015 and 2016 (Nóia Júnior & Sentelhas 2019) One of the methods to minimize the negative effects of climate on the soybean crop is changing the planting date, thus exposing the crop cycle to meteorological conditions favorable to high yields (Lima et al 2019). In the present study, it is hypothesized that the optimal sowing window (OSW) may change according to the ENSO phase (El Niño, La Niña and neutral).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation