1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(95)00057-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agroforestry trajectories among smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: innovation and resiliency in pioneer and older settled areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
3
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with the case reported for the Brazilian Amazon (Smith et al, 1996). Smith et al (1996) suggested that insufficient financial aid appeared to be the major constraint to the expansion of cash cropping. In Paori, after the government stopped providing free seedlings in 2002, a situation similar to that of the Brazilian Amazon has emerged regarding cash cropping of litchi/longan.…”
Section: Inter-household Variation In Adoption Of Cash Croppingcontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast with the case reported for the Brazilian Amazon (Smith et al, 1996). Smith et al (1996) suggested that insufficient financial aid appeared to be the major constraint to the expansion of cash cropping. In Paori, after the government stopped providing free seedlings in 2002, a situation similar to that of the Brazilian Amazon has emerged regarding cash cropping of litchi/longan.…”
Section: Inter-household Variation In Adoption Of Cash Croppingcontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Paori and the Papua New Guinea highlands had some common characteristics regarding the initiation of cash cropping; in neither region did farmers have to invest money for seedlings because these were provided by the local government to encourage rural development. This is in contrast with the case reported for the Brazilian Amazon (Smith et al, 1996). Smith et al (1996) suggested that insufficient financial aid appeared to be the major constraint to the expansion of cash cropping.…”
Section: Inter-household Variation In Adoption Of Cash Croppingcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…They cope with uncertainty by exploring a range of natural resources available at the farm-lot level, including plants and game from the forest, fish from rivers and raised in ponds, and a wide range of crops and animal husbandry that are used both for household consumption and commercialization. Diverse farming systems adopted by smallholders' communities worldwide also play a key role in protecting agro-biodiversity (Brookfield et al 2005, Pinedo-Vasquez et al 2002, Smith et al 1996. Farmers also are engaged in wage labor and a range of urban and rural commercial activities.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit use is related also to several other factors such as social organization, family size and land tenure, and plays considerable influence on determining crop allocation and field size (Chibnik 1994). In this context, diversification of land uses comprises a strategy that is important both to reduce risks and to attend household consumption needs , Pinedo-Vasquez et al 2002, Smith et al 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some landless peasants have achieved significant agricultural production on their occupied land (Kondo and Doi 2005). A common form of small-scale agriculture in the Amazon region is polycultural agriculture, which includes both tree and annual crops (Smith et al 1996, Leite et al 2004, Hoch et al 2009). Tree crop cultivation is advantageous as it prevents soil deterioration, mitigates forest biomass loss, and has a long-spanned harvestable period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%