Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review

Abstract

International audienceThe forecasted 9.1 billion population in 2050 will require an increase in food production for an additional two billion people. There is thus an active debate on new farming practices that could produce more food in a sustainable way. Here, we list agroecological cropping practices in temperate areas. We classify practices according to efficiency, substitution, and redesign. We analyse their advantages and drawbacks with emphasis on diversification. We evaluate the potential use of the practices for future agriculture. Our major findings are: (1) we distinguish 15 categories of agroecological practices (7 practices involve increasing efficiency or substitution, and 8 practices need a redesign often based on diversification). (2) The following agroecological practices are so far poorly integrated in actual agriculture: biofertilisers; natural pesticides; crop choice and rotations; intercropping and relay intercropping; agroforestry with timber, fruit, or nut trees; allelopathic plants; direct seeding into living cover crops or mulch; and integration of semi-natural landscape elements at field and farm or their management at landscape scale. These agroecological practices have only a moderate potential to be broadly implemented in the next decade. (3) By contrast, the following practices are already well integrated: organic fertilisation, split fertilisation, reduced tillage, drip irrigation, biological pest control, and cultivar choice

Organic No-Till with Roller Crimpers: Agro-ecosystem Services and Applications in Organic Mediterranean Vegetable Productions

“…In sustainable/organic farming systems, ASC represent a powerful tool for farmers to positively influence the agro-ecosystem by promoting the whole soil-plant system equilibrium in space and time (Kremen & Miles, 2012;Canali, 2013;Wezel et al, 2014). ASC may have impact on soil fertility (Thorup Montemurro et al, 2013), occurrence of weeds (Bàrberi, 2002;Hayden et al, 2012), diseases and pests (Masiunas, 1998;Patkowska et al, 2013).…”

Designing agroecological transitions; A review

“…Some authors address production-oriented agriculture issues without distinguishing between the two forms of ecological modernisation (Godfray et al 2010;Wezel et al 2013). In line with Horlings and Marsden (2011), we argue that this is problematic for at least two main reasons.…”

Shifting Priorities in Degrowth Research: An Argument for the Centrality of Human Needs

“…More concretely, such scholars have frequently suggested that organic/agro-ecological food production is desirable and necessary (e.g., Boonstra and Joosee, 2013;Kallis, 2011). This type of agriculture integrates ecological processes into farming practices instead of relying on fertilizers, pesticides or genetic modifications of organisms (see Gomiero et al, 2011 andWezel et al, 2014: 3 for research reviews on the performance of organic agriculture). Organic agriculture does not use synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which is responsible for 75% of all CO2 emissions in conventional farming (Haas et al, 1995), uses up to 75% less fossil fuels (LaSalle and Hepperly, 2008: 4) and produces higher rates of soil carbon (instead of emitting it to the atmosphere as in conventional farming).…”