Agro-ecological functions of crop residues under conservation agriculture. A review

Abstract

Conservation agriculture, which is based on minimum tillage, permanent soil cover and crop rotations, has widely been promoted as a practice to maintain or improve soil quality and enhance crop productivity. To a large extent, the beneficial effects of conservation agriculture are expected to be provided by permanent soil cover with crop residues. Surface crop residues play an important role for crop growth through their benefits on soil-related structural components and processes in the agro-ecosystem, referred to in this study as agro-ecological functions. Through a meta-analysis of the literature, we have studied the relative effects of surface crop residue levels on the performance of a set of agro-ecological functions compared with a no-till bare soil, i.e., without surface residues. The selected agro-ecological functions were soil water evaporation control, soil water infiltration, soil water runoff control, soil loss control, soil nutrient availability, soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and gains, weed control and soil meso- and macrofauna abundance. The potential effects of crop residue cover were quantified using boundary line models. Our main findings were (1) 8 t ha−1 of residues were needed to decrease soil water evaporation by about 30% compared to no-till bare soil. (2) To achieve the maximum effect on soil water infiltration, water runoff and soil loss control, residue amounts of at least 2 t ha−1 were required. (3) The effect of increasing the amounts of surface crop residues on soil nutrient supply (N, P and K) was relatively low; the boundary line models were not significant. (4) The average annual SOC gain increased with increasing amounts of residues, with a mean of 0.38 t C ha−1 year−1 with 4 to 5 t ha−1 of residues. (5) Weed emergence and biomass can be reduced by 50% compared to a no-till bare soil with residue amounts of 1 t ha−1 or more. (6) There was a weak response in soil meso- and macrofauna abundance to increasing amounts of surface crop residues. The maximum effect corresponded to an increase of 45% compared to a no-till bare soil and was reached from 10 t ha−1 of residues. Our findings suggest that optimal amounts of surface residues in the practice of conservation agriculture will largely depend on the type of constraints to crop production which can be addressed with mulching. (Résumé d'auteur

Clipping Forage Sorghum Twice and Nitrogen Topdressing Offer an Option for Dual-Purpose Use for Cover Cropping and Fodder in Mixed Crop/Livestock Farming Systems

“…Working in a semi-arid region that receives about 580 mm of rainfall per year, Choudhary et al [7] showed that water infiltration and retention increased significantly with 2 t ha −1 of crop residue. Similarly, research conducted by Swella et al [8], Nichols et al [9], and Ranaivoson et al [10] suggested 2 t ha −1 as the minimum threshold for improving water infiltration and retention, and also the ideal level for reducing soil loss and weed infestation.…”

Management of service crops for the provision of ecosystem services in vineyards: A review

“…Mulch management is essential for weed suppression as it depends both on the features of crop residues and on the targeted weeds to suppress (Ranaivoson et al, 2017). The difficulty is to find a service crop that efficiently competes with winter weeds and produces enough mulch in summer to impede the emergence of summer weeds (Fourie, 2010).…”

Sustainable Weed Management for Conservation Agriculture: Options for Smallholder Farmers

“…In addressing weed control challenges, scientific studies have provided evidence that minimum and no-tillage induce shifts of weed population particularly towards perennial weeds, thus creating a long-lasting weed problem [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Moreover, annual weeds such as Kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.)…”