2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10037-004-0062-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agriculture on the move: Exploring regional differences in farm exit rates in Western Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Aldanondo and Ramos (1999) relate agricultural exit to farm succession and farmer retirement and demonstrate the impact of off-farm employment on the stabilization of farms. Glauben et al (2003) reach similar conclusions in their analysis of regional farm exit in Germany. Farm exit is related to retirement and succession in Germany, with lower exit rates being reported in regions where there is a high share of parttime farmers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For instance, Aldanondo and Ramos (1999) relate agricultural exit to farm succession and farmer retirement and demonstrate the impact of off-farm employment on the stabilization of farms. Glauben et al (2003) reach similar conclusions in their analysis of regional farm exit in Germany. Farm exit is related to retirement and succession in Germany, with lower exit rates being reported in regions where there is a high share of parttime farmers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, any changes in the macroeconomic environment are likely to have major effects on agriculture, taking as an example the latest global economic crisis (Zawojska 2009). The number of farms in Europe has continuously declined (Glauben et al 2006;Breustedt and Glauben 2007). Farm exits accelerate the growth of the remaining farms by the redistribution of production factors.…”
Section: Methodology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when variable region was removed from the model, the presence of a successor showed a slightly negative effect, which is not in agreement with previous studies Gale 2003;Glauben et al 2006). This effect could be explained by the fact that the owner assumes that there is a successor for taking over the farm (56% of the answers); nevertheless the farmer is not preparing to exit and pass on the farm to his/her successor (72% of them said did not want to retire from farming).…”
Section: Explanation Of the Analyses Findingssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Farming has been recognized as providing the possibility of being self-employed and having more family members work (FAMLAB) on the farm (Chang et al 2011). It also has been recognized as an activity that allows, and influences, a farmer to pass the business down to the next generation (SUCCESSOR) and keep the farm in the family Lobley et al 2002;Gale 2003;Glauben et al 2006;. We expected these three variables to have a positive association with the decision to stay.…”
Section: Appendix 21mentioning
confidence: 99%