2018
DOI: 10.1650/condor-18-16.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural land cover does not affect the diet of Tree Swallows in wetland-dominated habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation in landscape contexts may also have resulted in Tree swallows feeding on diets differing not in prey species composition, but also in nutritive value. Indeed, the diet of Tree swallows varies across the agricultural intensification gradient covered by our study area (Bellavance et al 2018; see also (Nocera et al 2012, Michelson et al 2018)). In the period during which Tree swallows provide food to nestlings, they eat more Diptera and less Ephemeroptera in landscapes dominated by row crops than in landscapes mostly devoted to forage crops and pastures (Bellavance et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in landscape contexts may also have resulted in Tree swallows feeding on diets differing not in prey species composition, but also in nutritive value. Indeed, the diet of Tree swallows varies across the agricultural intensification gradient covered by our study area (Bellavance et al 2018; see also (Nocera et al 2012, Michelson et al 2018)). In the period during which Tree swallows provide food to nestlings, they eat more Diptera and less Ephemeroptera in landscapes dominated by row crops than in landscapes mostly devoted to forage crops and pastures (Bellavance et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between May and July of 2017 and 2018, we visited wetlands at 5 sites, 2 dominated by grassland (including tamed pasture) and 3 dominated by agriculture (cropland), near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. These sites were chosen because of their accessibility and historical use by other researchers (Stanton et al ; Michelson et al ) and are named as follows: Allan, Saskatchewan, Canada (grassland, 51.6260 N, –105.9717 W); St. Denis National Wildlife Area (grassland, 52.2153 N, –106.0770 W); Burr, Saskatchewan, Canada (cropland, 51.9809 N, –105.0774 W); Colonsay, Saskatchewan, Canada (cropland, 52.0264 N, –105.9217 W); and Humboldt, Saskatchewan, Canada (cropland, 52.1993 N, –105.2883 W). At Humboldt, approximately half of the site was acquired by Ducks Unlimited in 2016 and has undergone some habitat restoration (R. Clark, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, personal communication).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between May and July of 2017 and 2018, we visited wetlands at 5 sites, 2 dominated by grassland (including tamed pasture) and 3 dominated by agriculture (cropland), near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. These sites were chosen because of their accessibility and historical use by other researchers (Stanton et al 2016;Michelson et al 2018) Saskatchewan, Canada (cropland, 52.1993N, -105.2883. At Humboldt, approximately half of the site was acquired by Ducks Unlimited in 2016 and has undergone some habitat restoration (R. Clark, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, personal communication).…”
Section: Study Area and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imlay et al (2017) found that low insect abundance was not related to a decrease in nestling survival and mass, as adults are able to increase their foraging efforts. Using isotopic analysis, Michelson et al (2018) found high diversity and annual variation in the nestling Tree Swallow diet, but insects from aquatic orders were consumed in greater proportion than insects from terrestrial orders. Our study is unable to determine if aquatic insects were included in the diet in larger proportions during earlier stages of nestling development, which would require the collection of boluses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%