Agricultural Insurance in Newly Developing Countries

Ray, P.K.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-029824-5.50026-4

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Met name de veranderde factoren die van belang zijn in een verzekering of andere vorm van risicoafdekking worden behandeld. De grondbeginselen van verzekeren zijn in te delen in een aantal principes (Ray, 1967;Rejda, 1998), waarbij vijf met name van belang zijn bij staartbijten, te weten:…”

Section: Vijf Principes Zijn Van Belang Bij Risicoafdekkingunclassified

Op weg naar ongecoupeerde varkensstaarten in Nederland : verkenning van economische aspecten en mogelijkheden voor implementatie

Hoste,

Hoofs,

Benus

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Vijf Principes Zijn Van Belang Bij Risicoafdekkingunclassified

Op weg naar ongecoupeerde varkensstaarten in Nederland : verkenning van economische aspecten en mogelijkheden voor implementatie

Hoste,

Hoofs,

Benus

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, the changing factors that are important in an insurance policy or other form of risk hedging are addressed. The fundamentals of insurance can be divided into a number of principles (Ray, 1967;Rejda, 1998), with five being particularly important in tail biting. These are:…”

Section: Five Principles Are Important In Risk Coveragementioning

confidence: 99%

Towards eliminating tail docking of pigs in the Netherlands : Exploration of economic aspects and opportunities for implementation

Hoste,

Hoofs,

Benus

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the transition towards pig farming without tail docking, an analysis has been performed of the cost increase, of conditions for supply chain implementation, and of the possibilities and feasibility of a calamity fund. Costs are mounting up to €26 per delivered pig, and to €29 per pig during the learning phase. Under the assumption that 5-15% of the pigs will have tail damage and thus will not be eligible for compensation, a remuneration of €28-31 per pig with undocked tail in good condition is necessary to cover costs on farm level. This derives from a model-based analysis, where assumptions were based on literature and interviews.Voor de transitie naar een varkenshouderij zonder couperen van staarten zijn berekeningen gedaan naar het effect op de kosten voor varkenshouders, naar voorwaarden voor implementatie in de keten, en naar mogelijkheden en de haalbaarheid van een calamiteitenfonds. De kosten voor het houden van dieren met ongecoupeerde staarten lopen op tot 26 euro per afgeleverd varken, en tot 29 euro per afgeleverd varken gedurende de leerfase. Aannemend dat er voor 5-15% van de varkens geen staartenbonus zal worden betaald, in verband met staartschade, bedraagt de benodigde vergoeding 28-31 euro per goedgekeurd varken om de kosten te dekken van het houden van varkens met ongecoupeerde staarten. Dit is gebaseerd op modelmatige berekeningen, waarbij literatuur en interviews zijn gebruikt voor de aannames.

show abstract

“…Agricultural insurance density is an important indicator for measuring the level of agricultural insurance development and represents the average level of agricultural insurance protection in a region. Ray P K. [40] measured the level of agricultural insurance development by per capita premium; Binswanger-Mkhize HP et al [41] considered the welfare effect of agricultural insurance when studying the impact of agricultural insurance on agricultural output and used changes in agricultural premiums to indicate the level of agricultural insurance development. This paper mainly studies the relationship between the level of agricultural insurance development and other factors and selects the density of agricultural insurance to represent the level of agricultural insurance development.…”

Section: Agricultural Insurance (Ins)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Relationship between Agricultural Technology Progress, Agricultural Insurance and Farmers’ Income

Tan

Tao

et al. 2022

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of the agricultural insurance policy and advancement of agricultural technology has great significance for the development of the agricultural economy of China, and it is an important source of national stability and modernization and development of the agriculture sector. Agricultural insurance policy uses the expansion of agricultural technology progress in the process of evaluation, investigation and claims settlement, and so on. Agricultural technology progress is effective in the reduction of some agricultural risks, it also affects farmers’ agricultural insurance behaviors, and optimizes the operating environment of agricultural insurance. The objective of this research is to explore the relationship between agricultural technology progress, agricultural insurance and farmers’ income. It also explains the mutual/cooperative relationship between agricultural technology progress and agricultural insurance. It provides the theoretical basis and data support to verify the promotion effect of agricultural insurance and agricultural technology progress on farmers’ income. This gives the improvement path for alleviating the spatial imbalance of China’s agricultural development. Keeping in view the aforementioned background and this research explores the effects of agricultural technological progress and agricultural insurance on the farmers’ income level. The panel data used for this research were from 2004 to 2019 and were grouped into two parts: high-density agricultural insurance areas and low-density agricultural insurance areas. The relationship between agricultural technology progress, agricultural insurance and farmers’ income was estimated using the Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) model. The results revealed that: (i) both agricultural technology progress and agricultural insurance have a positive effect on the farmers’ income level, but this effect varies across regions; (ii) impact of the agricultural insurance on farmers’ income is greater than the impact of agricultural technology progress on farmers’ income; and (iii) the role of agricultural insurance in promoting agricultural technology progress exists only in areas with high-density agricultural insurance. Therefore, when formulating policies, the policymakers should consider regional differences and characteristics, and adopt development models keeping in view regional variations in adaptability with different agricultural insurance densities, Moreover, they should improve agricultural security policies, optimize agricultural capital allocation, promote the transformation of the agricultural economy from extensional growth to connotative growth, and further improve the agricultural productive income of rural residents.

show abstract

Agricultural Insurance in Newly Developing Countries

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Op weg naar ongecoupeerde varkensstaarten in Nederland : verkenning van economische aspecten en mogelijkheden voor implementatie

Op weg naar ongecoupeerde varkensstaarten in Nederland : verkenning van economische aspecten en mogelijkheden voor implementatie

Towards eliminating tail docking of pigs in the Netherlands : Exploration of economic aspects and opportunities for implementation

Dynamic Relationship between Agricultural Technology Progress, Agricultural Insurance and Farmers’ Income

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About