2022
DOI: 10.31223/x5vk7p
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural Flood Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Quantification in Iowa

Abstract: Agricultural lands are often impacted by flooding, which results in economic losses and causes food insecurity across the world. Due to the world’s growing population, land-use alteration is frequently practiced to meet global demand. However, land-use changes combined with climate change have resulted in extreme hydrological changes (i.e., flooding and drought) in many areas. The state of Iowa has experienced several flooding events over the last couple of decades (e.g., 1993, 2008, 2014, 2016, 2019). Also, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geomorphic input considered in this study includes the Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) index and a land cover map. The HAND method is frequently used to predict flood inundation extents (Hu and Demir, 2021;Li et al, 2022) to support flood mitigation and impact analysis (Alabbad et al, 2021;Yildirim and Demir, 2022). HAND has been applied as a standalone flood mapping approach (Chaudhuri et al, 2021;Li and Demir, 2022a;Li et al, 2023), a supplementary dataset to refine the flood extent extracted from remotely sensed images (Zeng et al, 2020;He et al, 2021;Li and Demir, 2022b), and an independent data layer in flood extent extraction with machine learning approaches (Aristizabal et al, 2020;Bosch et al, 2020;Esfandiari et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geomorphic input considered in this study includes the Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) index and a land cover map. The HAND method is frequently used to predict flood inundation extents (Hu and Demir, 2021;Li et al, 2022) to support flood mitigation and impact analysis (Alabbad et al, 2021;Yildirim and Demir, 2022). HAND has been applied as a standalone flood mapping approach (Chaudhuri et al, 2021;Li and Demir, 2022a;Li et al, 2023), a supplementary dataset to refine the flood extent extracted from remotely sensed images (Zeng et al, 2020;He et al, 2021;Li and Demir, 2022b), and an independent data layer in flood extent extraction with machine learning approaches (Aristizabal et al, 2020;Bosch et al, 2020;Esfandiari et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we don't have much control over meteorological events, scientists and engineers are using the tools and methods to inform the public with more accurate weather forecast models, river forecast models, disaster planning (Teague et al, 2021), flood mitigation (Carson et al, 2018;Yildirim and Demir, 2021), and advanced early warning platforms to reduce losses and help the people who may be affected by floods (Alabbad et al, 2022). It's important to use accurate flood forecasting models to figure out how much land will be flooded (Li et al, 2022;Hu and Demir, 2021), as well as how floods will affect transportation networks (Alabbad et al, 2021) and agriculture fields (Yildirim and Demir, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural disasters are projected to cost more than $300 billion per year in direct asset losses; this figure rises to $520 billion when indirect losses are taken into account (Hallegatte et al 2017;Rentschler and Salhab, 2020). In addition to the economic losses, social insecurity, food security, and production distributions that are challenging to quantify but are undeniable consequences of natural hazards (Haltas et al, 2021;Yildirim and Demir, 2022a;World Bank, 2021). To mitigate the effects of these consequences on communities, decision-makers develop flood preparedness strategies and mitigation action plans in their jurisdictions (Teague et al, 2021;Yildirim, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%