2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural education preservice teachers’ metacognitive processes and reflective observations during a reflection-in-action activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…67 This is in line with the napa discovered by Amanda Bowling et al, which states that RT will support the metacognitive improvement of teachers. 68 This study also found it inconsistent with previous research that the reflectivity of teachers will support the morale of students in the process of interaction during and outside of learning.…”
Section: E Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…67 This is in line with the napa discovered by Amanda Bowling et al, which states that RT will support the metacognitive improvement of teachers. 68 This study also found it inconsistent with previous research that the reflectivity of teachers will support the morale of students in the process of interaction during and outside of learning.…”
Section: E Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, the debrief discussions were centered on epistemic frames of providing feedback, attending to science concepts, highlighting PK, focusing on student learning and prompting teacher reflection. The findings align with previous studies that explored debrief meetings for supporting teacher reflection (Bowling et al, 2022), providing feedback about science content and PCK (Hinojosa, 2022;Kind and Chan, 2019) and attending to student learning (Wieselmann and Sager, 2023). Given the significant epistemic frame of teacher reflection within our network graph (see Figure 2), Nick engaged in reflection and effectively drew upon his experiences teaching the lesson when prompted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Given the significant epistemic frame of teacher reflection within our network graph (see Figure 2), Nick engaged in reflection and effectively drew upon his experiences teaching the lesson when prompted. However, according to Bowling et al (2022), explicit prompting for reflection leading to surface-level responses for early-career teachers appears to be a common problem. In addition to teacher reflection, providing feedback on the lesson implementation was a strong epistemic connection (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations