2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural biotechnology and smallholder farmers in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cotton is the largest fiber producing and important cash crop in Pakistan and India 1 . Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) is the major biotic constraint of cotton, transmitted by the insect vector Bemisia tabaci (whitefly) 2, 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cotton is the largest fiber producing and important cash crop in Pakistan and India 1 . Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) is the major biotic constraint of cotton, transmitted by the insect vector Bemisia tabaci (whitefly) 2, 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, agricultural system innovation in high risk or fragile natural environments requires careful institutional management of informal and formal knowledge systems (Brooks and Loevinsohn 2011), particularly in the context of the smallholder farmers operating in developing areas (Foley et al 2011;Anthony and Ferroni 2012). Many studies have identified the potential for smallholder agro-ecological approaches to promote social and ecological sustainability in different developing area settings (Pinstrup-Andersen and Hazell 1985;Pinstrup-Andersen et al 1999;Conway 1987;Pinstrup-Andersen and Herforth 2008); however, their potential to innovate is often undermined by limited access to resources, low levels of technology adoption, difficulties in coordination, asymmetries in information flow, and high levels of exposure to external and internal shocks Kydd and Dorward 2004;Birner and Resnick 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one relates to the amount of funding and investment that influence research capacity and the ability to develop enhanced traits and varieties genetics (Anthony and Ferroni, 2011;Adenle, 2014). A second class of factors results from the lack of foreseeable regulatory structures, as a result of high development costs (Bayer et al, 2010), accountability risks and insufficient supervision expertise for biotech crops.…”
Section: Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual property is also taken as an obstacle, however, through conducting some research in many developing countries, particularly in SSA, it can be seen that intellectual property is not necessarily an impediment that cannot overcome with (Farre et al, 2010;Bazuin et al, 2011). A third category of restricting factors that is observed in many developing nations, especially in SSA, comes up from unavailability of effective seed systems and seed markets, without agricultural support services, for farmers to promptly access enhanced genetics (Anthony and Ferroni, 2011).…”
Section: Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%