2019
DOI: 10.3390/electronics8040427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AgreeRelTrust—A Simple Implicit Trust Inference Model for Memory-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Systems

Abstract: Recommendation systems alleviate the problem of information overload by helping users find information relevant to their preference. Memory-based recommender systems use correlation-based similarity to measure the common interest among users. The trust between users is often used to address the issues associated with correlation-based similarity measures. However, in most applications, the trust relationships between users are not available. A popular method to extract the implicit trust relationship between u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, in item-item TBRS, the reliance of items is measured by applying users' feedback on the items [56] or studying users' activity with these items [28,57,58].However, according to the methodology of trust integration, TBRS can be categorized as memory-based [30,38,59] and model-based [20,38,60,61] approaches. Further, the TBRS can be classified based on the trust definition as either explicit [19,38,52,62] or implicit [12,13,17,18] or hybrid trust-based recommender system [35,63,64]. Figure 3 shows the classification of TBRS in a row.…”
Section: Classification Of Trust-based Recommender Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other side, in item-item TBRS, the reliance of items is measured by applying users' feedback on the items [56] or studying users' activity with these items [28,57,58].However, according to the methodology of trust integration, TBRS can be categorized as memory-based [30,38,59] and model-based [20,38,60,61] approaches. Further, the TBRS can be classified based on the trust definition as either explicit [19,38,52,62] or implicit [12,13,17,18] or hybrid trust-based recommender system [35,63,64]. Figure 3 shows the classification of TBRS in a row.…”
Section: Classification Of Trust-based Recommender Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITM11 : Zahir et al [12] also applied the liked and disliked items concept in their trust metric and calculated the trust, named as AgreeRelTrust, by combining users' agreements and relative activities in the system. The agreement A u,v of a pair of user is defined according to the positive and negative agreements in co-rated items where positive agreement denotes liked items by both users, and negative agreement determines the disliked items of both users.…”
Section: Implicit Trust-based Recommender Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current recommendation system requires further enhancements to make the referral method more effective and broader [23]. You can apply it to a wider range of real-world applications, including vacation, investor-specific types of financial services, and products recommended for purchase in stores [24]. These enhancements include better ways to represent user behavior and proposed information, as well as advanced recommendation modeling a methodology that incorporates various contextual information into the referral process, uses multi-criteria assessments and develops a more intrusive and flexible referral method that is more effective based on the performance of the referral system [25,26].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model has considerably higher computation costs because of the initial prediction calculation during the trust matrix generation. Addressing these issues with prediction accuracy-based trust models, Zahir et al [13] proposed AgreeRelTrust, which is a model that uses the agreement between users to infer trust, eliminating the need to calculate the initial predictions. This method also takes into account the activeness of the users when calculating the trust; however, the method is a memory-based model, and is thus not as computationally efficient as the MF variants.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ImpFactor = sqr(len(I u )) × sum(I u ) 13: Since both the trust and latent features are estimated together, they are trained with the same number of epochs. Then, the outputs of Algorithm 1 are combined using any of the three combination methods mentioned earlier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%