Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women and the second cause of cancer mortality in women. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This is an observational descriptive (retrospective and prospective) study, carried out in magnetic resonance imaging department of radiological center in Shahid Hemn teaching hospital and breast disease treatment center, Sulaymaniyah. One hundred sixty one patients screened with different breast complaint during (January of 2014- March of 2019). We focused on cases of breast cancer only were included 32 patients, also we analyzed the findings of the magnetic resonance imaging; Review was performed to determine lesion type (mass or non-mass), lesion descriptors, patient age, and biopsy. Histological findings were reviewed. Results Magnetic resonance imaging detected all cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) 13(40.6%), in which Sensitivity (100.0%), Specificity (54.5%), (PPV) Positive Predictive Value (27.1%), (NPV) Negative Predictive Value (100.0%), and accuracy (61.1%). While invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) was 10 (31.25%), 9 cases were defined as malignant lesion. It is Sensitivity (90.0%), Specificity (58.8%), Positive Predictive Value (21.4%), Negative Predictive Value (97.9%), and Accuracy (62.2%). Magnetic resonance imaging sensitivity and specificity to differentiate between benign and malignant lesion were (84.8%) and (64.9%) but, Positive Predictive value, Negative Predictive Value, and Accuracy were (58.3%), (88.1%), (72.2%) respectively. False positive were 20 (41.7%), while false negative were 5 (11.9%). Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging is important in the management of breast cancer and accurate in assessing carcinoma extension and multiplicity. It is seen as being too sensitive, less specific.
Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women and the second cause of cancer mortality in women. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This is an observational descriptive (retrospective and prospective) study, carried out in magnetic resonance imaging department of radiological center in Shahid Hemn teaching hospital and breast disease treatment center, Sulaymaniyah. One hundred sixty one patients screened with different breast complaint during (January of 2014- March of 2019). We focused on cases of breast cancer only were included 32 patients, also we analyzed the findings of the magnetic resonance imaging; Review was performed to determine lesion type (mass or non-mass), lesion descriptors, patient age, and biopsy. Histological findings were reviewed. Results Magnetic resonance imaging detected all cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) 13(40.6%), in which Sensitivity (100.0%), Specificity (54.5%), (PPV) Positive Predictive Value (27.1%), (NPV) Negative Predictive Value (100.0%), and accuracy (61.1%). While invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) was 10 (31.25%), 9 cases were defined as malignant lesion. It is Sensitivity (90.0%), Specificity (58.8%), Positive Predictive Value (21.4%), Negative Predictive Value (97.9%), and Accuracy (62.2%). Magnetic resonance imaging sensitivity and specificity to differentiate between benign and malignant lesion were (84.8%) and (64.9%) but, Positive Predictive value, Negative Predictive Value, and Accuracy were (58.3%), (88.1%), (72.2%) respectively. False positive were 20 (41.7%), while false negative were 5 (11.9%). Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging is important in the management of breast cancer and accurate in assessing carcinoma extension and multiplicity. It is seen as being too sensitive, less specific.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.