Agreement of a Point-of-Viewer and a Jussive Subject

Seo, Saetbyol; Hoe, Semoon

doi:10.15860/sigg.25.1.201502.1

studiesingenerativegrammar

2015

DOI: 10.15860/sigg.25.1.201502.1

|View full text |Cite

Agreement of a Point-of-Viewer and a Jussive Subject

Saetbyol Seo¹,

Semoon Hoe²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On applications of this approach to OC in East Asian languages, see Pak et al. (2008), Madigan (2008a, 2008b), Lee (2009), Seo and Hoe (2015), Sisovics (2018), Matsuda (2019, 2021), Liao and Wang (2022).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Noncanonical Obligatory Control

Landau

2024

Language and Linguist. Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intensive research on Obligatory Control (OC) in the past 2 decades has revealed a rich crosslinguistic terrain of deviations from the classical format. Five types of noncanonical OC are surveyed here: Finite control, controlled overt pronouns, partial control, proxy control and crossed control. Each one is described and illustrated, paying attention to methodological difficulties in establishing its characteristic empirical signature. We then turn to a critical assessment of leading theoretical accounts of these phenomena, pointing to merits and faults, and indicating how they can be integrated with broader concerns of syntactic theory.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Noncanonical Obligatory Control

Landau

2024

Language and Linguist. Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nonobligatory Control with Communication Verbs: New Evidence and Implications

Landau

2020

Linguistic Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When occurring without their goal argument, communication verbs induce two types of control: obligatory control (OC) by the implicit goal, or nonobligatory control (NOC) by a salient antecedent. Arguments are presented to demonstrate that the two are genuinely distinct, and furthermore, that the NOC option is not reducible to embedded imperatives. The two types of control implicate the same grammatical representations, the single difference being the choice of the context of evaluation for PRO (fixed as the reported context in OC, free in NOC). Finally, evidence is presented (from VP-ellipsis) that reference to deictic antecedents in NOC is not direct but mediated via grammatically present entities (SPEAKER and ADDRESSEE functions).

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Agreement of a Point-of-Viewer and a Jussive Subject

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Noncanonical Obligatory Control

Noncanonical Obligatory Control

Nonobligatory Control with Communication Verbs: New Evidence and Implications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About