1996
DOI: 10.1159/000189473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between the Classical Urea Kinetic Model and Direct Dialysis Quantification: Importance of Urea Rebound

Abstract: From a review of the literature regarding kinetic models used for assessing the adequacy of hemodialysis, no definite conclusions can be drawn as to whether the classical urea kinetic model (UKM) or modified direct dialysis quantification (mDDQ) is more reliable. We compared mDDQ with classical UKM and with a modified UKM that employs an equilibrated urea value. From the theoretical viewpoint, no substantial conflict is found between the two models as regards the dialysis dose, if urea rebound is considered. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole body urea clearance (K) was calculated as the removed urea divided by the product of the length of the session and log mean urea concentration [16](see ‘Appendix’). To evaluate the variability of the time required to attain the target dose of dialysis, the duration of the midweek session of the second study week (HD 5 in fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Whole body urea clearance (K) was calculated as the removed urea divided by the product of the length of the session and log mean urea concentration [16](see ‘Appendix’). To evaluate the variability of the time required to attain the target dose of dialysis, the duration of the midweek session of the second study week (HD 5 in fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G week was compared with the total urea removed during the three hemodialysis sessions of the second study week. Simultaneously to G 1 , G 2 and G 3 calculations, V was determined in each treatment from an intradialytic mass balance equation by the single-pool or by the double-pool model, according to DDQ [8], using a variable-volume modified formula [16]. The V was also obtained using the anthropometric Watson formulas [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations