2023
DOI: 10.1037/pas0001234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between mother, father, and teacher ratings of cognitive disengagement syndrome (sluggish cognitive tempo) in children with autism and children with ADHD.

Abstract: No studies have analyzed differences between mother, father, and teacher ratings of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; formerly sluggish cognitive tempo). The sample included 1,115 children with autism and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) 4-16 years of age who were rated by mothers on the Pediatric Behavior Scale. Subsets of these children were also rated by fathers and/or teachers, resulting in 896 mother/father, 964 mother/teacher, and 745 father/teacher dyads. The CDS factor comprised … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, although our study used two methods for assessing CDS symptoms (rating scales and clinical interviews), both methods are based on self-reported information, and no procedures were used for possible response bias or atypical/random responding. Third, the only external validity examined in the present study was broad functional impairment, and it will be important to examine CDS-CI scores in relation to specific domains of functioning, including in the school context (e.g., Mayes et al, 2023). Fourth, only cross-sectional data were available in the present study, precluding determining any temporal associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, although our study used two methods for assessing CDS symptoms (rating scales and clinical interviews), both methods are based on self-reported information, and no procedures were used for possible response bias or atypical/random responding. Third, the only external validity examined in the present study was broad functional impairment, and it will be important to examine CDS-CI scores in relation to specific domains of functioning, including in the school context (e.g., Mayes et al, 2023). Fourth, only cross-sectional data were available in the present study, precluding determining any temporal associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%