2001
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.2006067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between Alternative Classifications of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract: To examine the agreement between two classifications of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that are used interchangeably in clinical practice and clinical research, we classified 118 patients taking part in a randomized trial with respect to the presence of ARDS using the North American-European Consensus Committee (NAECC) and the Lung Injury Severity Score (LISS) criteria. The incidence of ARDS using NAECC criteria was 55.1% (95% confidence interval, 46.1% to 64.1%), and using the LISS criteria 61.9% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
36
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…21 For the primary outcome of IOP-lowering effects between groups at study completion, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) across studies using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, that recognizes …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 For the primary outcome of IOP-lowering effects between groups at study completion, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) across studies using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, that recognizes …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the degree of agreement among the scales, we used the Kappa agreement statistic, which designates the following levels of concordance: 0 = absent; 0 to 0.2 = minimal; 0.2 to 0.4 = reasonable; 0.4 to 0.6 = moderate; 0.6 to 0.8 = substantial; 0.8 to 1.0 = near-perfect (28) . Fisher's exact test was applied to analyze correlations between the characteristics of two or more variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRALI in TACO je težko ločiti med seboj, saj je klinična slika zelo podobna, pri TRALI gre namreč za nekardiogeni, pri TACO pa kardiogeni pljučni edem (32). V pomoč so nam lahko vrednosti krvnega tlaka (pri TRALI so značilno nizke, pri TACO pa visoke) in povišana telesna temperatura (TRALI), pri TRALI lahko beležimo v hemogramu tudi prehodno levkopenijo (33)(34)(35)(36). Poleg tega nam je v pomoč tudi NT proBNP, ki je kazalec srčnega popuščanja in je tipično povišan pri TACO ter načeloma nizek pri TRA-LI (37,38).…”
Section: Obravnava In Zdravljenje Respiratornih Transfuzijskih Reakcijunclassified