2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between actigraphic and polysomnographic measures of sleep in adults with and without chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, there were some notable differences between WatchPAT data and PSG; namely, difference in sleep times and oximetry. Sleep time differences were similar to those reported from other actigraphy technology [23], and are of unclear clinical significance, particularly as they did not seem to impact respiratory event indices substantially. Oximetry technology has previously been shown to vary between devices [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Third, there were some notable differences between WatchPAT data and PSG; namely, difference in sleep times and oximetry. Sleep time differences were similar to those reported from other actigraphy technology [23], and are of unclear clinical significance, particularly as they did not seem to impact respiratory event indices substantially. Oximetry technology has previously been shown to vary between devices [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Third, compared to the sleep characteristics measured by polysomnography, actigraphy tends to overestimate total sleep time and sleep efficiency and to underestimate sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset in adults regardless of chronic physical health conditions. A recent meta-analysis of 96 studies in adults with and without chronic conditions (Conley et al, 2019) concluded that actigraphy significantly underestimated sleep onset latency compared to PSG in both healthy adults (by 8.1 min) and those with chronic conditions (by 7.7 min). In addition, we did not collect sleep diary data and the participants did not press the event marker button on the actigraph to identify the lights-off and lights-on times, which would have allowed us to generate a more accurate estimate of sleep onset latency and efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wrist actigraphy is a valid measure of rest-activity rhythms and sleep characteristics, and discriminates sleep from wake (Conley et al, 2019; Smith et al, 2018). Data were collected in 30-second epochs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%