1995
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00189-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement among evaluators of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
58
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such evaluation is subjective in itself, and consent is often not reached even among specialized and experienced personnel (Farin et al 1995). Furthermore, selection of embryos based on morphology has been shown to be difficult, especially for embryos of intermediate morphological qualities (Farin et al 1995, Hasler 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such evaluation is subjective in itself, and consent is often not reached even among specialized and experienced personnel (Farin et al 1995). Furthermore, selection of embryos based on morphology has been shown to be difficult, especially for embryos of intermediate morphological qualities (Farin et al 1995, Hasler 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such evaluation is subjective in itself, and consent is often not reached even among specialized and experienced personnel (Farin et al 1995). Furthermore, selection of embryos based on morphology has been shown to be difficult, especially for embryos of intermediate morphological qualities (Farin et al 1995, Hasler 1998. More objective selection criteria are therefore needed (Neuber et al 2003, Scott 2003, and a better understanding of embryonic metabolism could be very useful in the development of new strategies for judging the quality and the developmental potential of individual embryos (Overström 1992, Overströ m et al 1992.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons evaluating embryos agreed just in 68.5% of cases, carrying out the assessment of embryos in different stages of development and various degeneration levels. It was most difficult to differentiate between embryos of good and sufficient quality (Farin et al 1995). On the other hand, no significant differences in the proportion of pregnant recipients were recorded between evaluating investigators.…”
Section: Morphological Classification Of Embryosrecent Studies and Pementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, even upon embryo evaluation by many different people the morphological assessment of embryos proved to be a useful way to evaluate their quality since a fundamental dependence was documented between the fertilization index and embryo quality class (Donaldson 1986). The subjective nature of the morphological assessment was proved by Farin et al (1995) who compared the results of six different people, evaluating 15 embryos received in vivo and produced in vitro. The assessment of embryo quality made by them differed significantly.…”
Section: Morphological Classification Of Embryosrecent Studies and Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of cryopreservation, in vitro produced embryos have decreased survival rates post-thawing after conventional freezing and postwarming after vitrification (Papadopoulos et al, 2002). Furthermore, there are morphological differences such as an overall lower cell number of both TE and ICM compared to in vivo derived embryos (Farin et al, 1995). The increasing use of in vitro produced embryos adds a challenge to the successful outcome of ET, and prediction of embryo quality prior to transfer could result in a major improvement of pregnancy rate.…”
Section: In Vitro Produced Embryosmentioning
confidence: 99%