1976
DOI: 10.2307/421410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrarian Socialism in the Third World: The Tanzanian Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the post-colonial era, the state was critical of the progressive farmer model, and favoured the earlier colonial model to focus on LSAIs and smallholder production as parallel strategies (Coulson & Diyamett, 2012). The new socialist government nationalised the LSAIs that had been established and were still in operation since the colonial era (including sisal, coffee, tea, sugar, coconuts and dairy) and transformed these to state farms (Lofchie, 1976;Nyerere, 1969). The more successful establishment of these LSAIs have generally been associated with favourable commodity prices, crops well-adapted to dry conditions (e.g., Sisal), and continued government support (Shivji, 1986;Hartemink & Wienk, 1995).…”
Section: Lsais In Tanzania -A Brief Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the post-colonial era, the state was critical of the progressive farmer model, and favoured the earlier colonial model to focus on LSAIs and smallholder production as parallel strategies (Coulson & Diyamett, 2012). The new socialist government nationalised the LSAIs that had been established and were still in operation since the colonial era (including sisal, coffee, tea, sugar, coconuts and dairy) and transformed these to state farms (Lofchie, 1976;Nyerere, 1969). The more successful establishment of these LSAIs have generally been associated with favourable commodity prices, crops well-adapted to dry conditions (e.g., Sisal), and continued government support (Shivji, 1986;Hartemink & Wienk, 1995).…”
Section: Lsais In Tanzania -A Brief Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Voluntary participation in socialist settlements has been replaced by coercive villageization, with a corresponding decline in agricultural production (Coulson 1975;Boesen 1976;Lofchie 1976;4 Leonard 1976;Mapolu and Philippson 1975;Williams 1976:141). Dissatisfied with the pace of the ujamaa village program, Tanzania's leaders in 1973-75 authorized a series of large-scale resettlement operations.…”
Section: Recent Research On Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%